-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathass1-rubric.html
190 lines (152 loc) · 4.94 KB
/
ass1-rubric.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
<html>
<head>
<title>comp10002 Foundations of Algorithms</title>
</head>
<body>
<h3>comp10002 Assignment 1 Marking Rubric and Feedback</h3>
<p>
<h4>Section A: Program Presentation</h4>
<p>Including: layout and style, readability, adherence to coding
expectations, general care and appearance.
</p>
<p><i>Additions</i>
</p>
<ul>
<li>Stage 1 initial allocation, +6.
<li>Stage 2 initial allocation, +1.
<li>Stage 3 initial allocation, +1.
</ul>
<p><i>Deductions</i>
</p>
<ul>
<li>use of magic numbers, -0.5;
<li>#defines not in upper case, -0.5;
<li>absence of function prototypes, -0.5;
<li>bad choice for function names, -0.5;
<li>bad choices for variable names, -0.5;
<li>inconsistent bracket placement, -0.5;
<li>inconsistent indentation, -0.5;
<li>excessive commenting, -0.5;
<li>insufficient commenting, -0.5;
<li>lack of whitespace (visual appeal), -0.5;
<li>lines >80 chars, -0.5;
<li>other stylistic issue (minor), -0.5;
<li>other stylistic issue (major), -1.0;
</ul>
<p>Marks in Section A won't go below zero.
</p>
<p><i>Bonus additions (included in total mark only if there were
marks deducted within this first section)</i>
</p>
<ul>
<li>comment at end that says "algorithms are fun", +0.5;
<li>overall care and presentation, +0.5;
</ul>
<h4>Section B: Structure and Approach</h4>
<p>Including: decomposition in to functions, development of data
structures and declaration of them at the appropriate locations,
choice of parameters to functions,
<!--use of appropriate <tt>struct</tt> and
<tt>typedef</tt> declarations, choice of algorithms or methods,
-->
overall flow and high-level readability.
</p>
<p><i>Additions</i>
</p>
<ul>
<li>Stage 1 initial allocation, +4.
<li>Stage 2 initial allocation, +1.
<li>Stage 3 initial allocation, +1.
</ul>
<p><i>Deductions</i>
</p>
<ul>
<li>duplicate code segments, -0.5;
<li>global variables, -0.5;
<li>main program too long or too complex, -0.5;
<li>insufficient use of functions, -0.5;
<li>functions too long or too complex, -0.5;
<li>overly complex algorithmic approach, -1.0;
<li>unnecessary duplication/copying of data, -0.5;
<li>overly complex function argument lists, -0.5;
<li>other structural issue (minor), -0.5;
<li>other structural issue (major), -1.0;
<!-- BEGIN-CHOICES
<li>using == for equality on doubles, -0.0;
<li>avoidance of typedefs, -0.5;
<li>avoidance of structs, -1.0;
<li>avoidance of hierarchical structs, -0.5;
<li>avoidance of pointers to structs, -0.5;
END-CHOICES -->
</ul>
<p>Marks in Section B won't go below zero.
</p>
<h4>Section C: Program Execution</h4>
<p>Including: compilation, execution on test data, output presentation
and readability.
Programs that do not compile in the test environment will lose all
marks in this section.
Be sure to check the GradeScope execution output
before you say "finished" to yourself.
</p>
<p><i>Additions</i>
</p>
<ul>
<li>Stage 1 initial allocation, +2.
<li>Stage 2 initial allocation, +2.
<li>Stage 3 initial allocation, +2.
</ul>
<p><i>Deductions</i>
</p>
<ul>
<li>failure to compile, -6.0;
<li>unnecessary warning messages in compilation, -2.0;
<li>incorrect Stage 1 layout or values error in any test, -0.5;
<li>different Stage 1 layout or values error in any test, -0.5;
<li>another different Stage 1 layout or values error in any test, -0.5;
<li>incorrect Stage 2 layout or values error in any test, -0.5;
<li>different Stage 2 layout or values error in any test, -0.5;
<li>another different Stage 2 layout or values error in any test, -0.5;
<li>incorrect Stage 3 layout or values error in any test, -0.5;
<li>different Stage 3 layout or values error in any test, -0.5;
<li>another different Stage 3 layout or values error in any test, -0.5;
</ul>
<p>Marks in Section C won't go below zero.
</p>
<h4>Section D: Late Penalty</h4>
<p>If you make a late submission without having prior agreement from
Alistair, a late penalty will be applied.
Overall marks won't go below zero.
No assignments -- with or without late penalty -- will be accepted
more than seven days after the assignment deadline.
</p>
<ul>
<li>one working day late, -2.0;
<li>two working days late, -4.0;
<li>three working days late, -6.0;
<li>four working days late, -8.0;
<li>five working days late, -10.0;
</ul>
<p>Marks in Section D will subtract from the sum of the
marks obtained in Sections A, B, and C.
</p>
<p><h4>Section E: Academic Honesty</h4>
<p>The following deductions will be applied to your overall mark if necessary.
Overall marks won't go below zero.
</p>
<ul>
<li>missing (or empty) Authorship Declaration at top of program, -5.0;
<li>significant overlap detected with another submission, -10.0;
<li>use of external code without attribution (minor), -2.0;
<li>use of external code without attribution (major), -10.0;
</ul>
<p>Marks in Section E will subtract from the sum of the
marks obtained in Sections A, B, and C, and add to any
subtractions incurred in Section D.
</p>
<p>Overall marks won't go below zero.
</p>
<p>
<i>Subject Coordinator: Alistair Moffat, [email protected]</i>
</body>
</html>