-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy path1993.html
245 lines (190 loc) · 9.3 KB
/
1993.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
<!-- This document was automatically generated with bibtex2html 1.96
(see http://www.lri.fr/~filliatr/bibtex2html/),
with the following command:
bibtex2html -dl -nodoc -nobibsource -nokeys -nokeywords -nofooter 1993.bib -->
<p><a name="csdl-92-07"></a>
Philip M. Johnson and Danu Tjahjono.
Improving software quality through computer supported collaborative
review.
In <em>Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer
Supported Cooperative Work</em>, September Publications-Conferences 1993.
[ <a href="ftp://ftp.ics.hawaii.edu/pub/tr/ics-tr-92-07.pdf">.pdf</a> ]
<blockquote><font size="-1">
Formal technical review (FTR) is a cornerstone of software quality
assurance. However, the labor intensive and manual nature of review, along
with basic unresolved questions about its process and products, means that
review is typically under-utilized or inefficiently applied within the
software development process. This paper introduces CSRS, a
computer-supported cooperative work environment for software review that
improves the efficiency of review activities and supports empirical
investigation of the appropriate parameters for review. The paper presents
a typical scenario of CSRS in review, its data and process model,
application to process maturation, relationship to other research, current
status, and future directions.
</font></blockquote>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-92-09"></a>
Philip M. Johnson.
Architectural concerns in EGRET.
<em>SIGOIS Bulletin</em>, April 1993.
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-92-11"></a>
Danu Tjahjono.
CSRS Design Specification.
Technical Report CSDL-92-11, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, December 1993.
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-01"></a>
Dadong Wan.
CLARE: A computer-supported collaborative learning environment
based on the thematic structure of research and learning artifacts.
Ph.D. Thesis Proposal CSDL-93-01, Department of Information and
Computer Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, January
1993.
[ <a href="http://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/1993/93-01/thesis-p.pdf">.pdf</a> ]
<blockquote><font size="-1">
This research concerns the representation issue in collaborative learning
environments. Our basic claim is that knowledge representation is not only
fundamental to machine learning, as shown by AI researchers, but also
essential to human learning, in particular, human metalearning. Few
existing learning support systems, however, provide representations which
help the learner make sense of and organize the subject content of
learning, integrate a wide range of classroom activities, (e.g., reading,
reviewing, writing, discussion), and compare and contrast various
viewpoints from individual learners. It is our primary purpose to
construct an example instance of such a representation, and to show that
useful computational manipulations can be performed on it, and that the
combination of the representation and related computational services can
actually lead to the improved learner's performance on selected
collaborative learning tasks.
</font></blockquote>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-02"></a>
Philip M. Johnson, Dadong Wan, Danu Tjahjono, Kiran Kavoori Ram, and Robert S.
Brewer.
EGRET requirements specification.
Technical Report CSDL-93-02, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, April 1993.
[ <a href="http://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/1993/93-02/93-02.ps">.ps</a> ]
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-03"></a>
Dadong Wan.
CLARE: a new approach to computer-supported collaborative learning.
Technical Report CSDL-93-03, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, May 1993.
[ <a href="http://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/1993/93-03/93-03.ps.gz">.ps.gz</a> ]
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-04"></a>
Danu Tjahjono.
CSRS: a new approach to software review.
Technical Report CSDL-93-04, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, May 1993.
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-05"></a>
Kiran Kavoori Ram.
DSB: The next generation tool for software engineers.
Technical Report CSDL-93-05, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, May 1993.
[ <a href="http://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/1993/93-05/Dsb-TR.pdf">.pdf</a> ]
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-06"></a>
Robert S. Brewer.
URN: A new way to think about Usenet.
Technical Report CSDL-93-06, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, May 1993.
[ <a href="http://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/1993/93-06/TR1.7.pdf">.pdf</a> ]
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-07"></a>
Philip M. Johnson, Danu Tjahjono, Dadong Wan, and Robert S. Brewer.
Experiences with CSRS: An instrumented software review environment.
In <em>Proceedings of the Pacific Northwest Software Quality
Conference</em>, October 1993.
[ <a href="http://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/1993/93-07/93-07.pdf">.pdf</a> ]
<blockquote><font size="-1">
Formal technical review (FTR) is a cornerstone of software quality
assurance. However, the labor-intensive and manual nature of review, along
with basic unresolved questions about its process and products, means that
review is typically under-utilized or inefficiently applied within the
software development process. This paper discusses our initial experiments
using CSRS, an instrumented, computer-supported cooperative work
environment for software review that reduces the manual, labor-intensive
nature of review activities and supports quantitative study of the process
and products of review. Our results indicate that CSRS increases both the
breadth and depth of information captured per person-hour of review time,
and that its design captures interesting measures of review process,
products, and effort.
</font></blockquote>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-11"></a>
Philip M. Johnson and Danu Tjahjono.
CSRS User Guide.
Technical Report CSDL-93-11, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, July 1993.
[ <a href="ftp://ftp.ics.hawaii.edu/pub/tr/ics-tr-93-16.pdf">.pdf</a> ]
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-12"></a>
Philip M. Johnson.
Improving software quality through formal technical review: A
research agenda.
Technical Report CSDL-93-12, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, October 1993.
[ <a href="http://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/1993/93-12/ftr-agenda93.ps">.ps</a> ]
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-15"></a>
Dadong Wan.
CLARE User's Guide.
Technical Report CSDL-93-15, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, September 1993.
[ <a href="http://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/1993/93-15/user-guide.ps.gz">.ps.gz</a> ]
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-16"></a>
Johnny Li.
Documentation for the XView graphical browser.
Technical Report CSDL-93-16, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, May 1993.
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-18"></a>
Rosemary Andrada and Carleton A. Moore.
Hyperbase server interface: Versions 2.0 and 2.1.
Technical Report CSDL-93-18, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, October 1993.
[ <a href="http://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/1993/93-18/TR-93-18.pdf">.pdf</a> ]
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-19"></a>
Danu Tjahjono.
Studying formal technical review methods using CSRS.
Technical Report CSDL-93-19, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, September 1993.
[ <a href="http://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/1993/93-19/paper.ps">.ps</a> ]
<blockquote><font size="-1">
The importance of formal technical review and its benefits have been
well documented, and yet there is a proliferation of methods in
practice with varying degrees of success.
This paper discusses a new approach to assess and study various
aspects associated with the effectiveness of current review methods.
Our basic approach is to use a computer assisted review system (CSRS)
equipped with mechanisms to model different review methods and
at the same time capture fine-grained measurements
about the product and the process of the review.
Through suitable experimental design, these data can be used to
compare the different methods to each other.
</font></blockquote>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-20"></a>
Philip M. Johnson, Danu Tjahjono, Dadong Wan, and Robert S. Brewer.
Gtables: From EGRET 2.x.x to EGRET 3.0.x.
Technical Report CSDL-93-20, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, November 1993.
[ <a href="http://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/1993/93-20/93-20.ps">.ps</a> ]
</p>
<p><a name="csdl-93-24"></a>
Dadong Wan.
CLARE 1.4.7 design document.
Technical Report CSDL-93-24, Department of Information and Computer
Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, September 1993.
[ <a href="http://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/1993/93-24/cla-1.4.7.ps.gz">.ps.gz</a> ]
</p>