Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parsing Awesome-Hacking-Spots markdown? #143

Open
Alex-Keyes opened this issue Dec 4, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

Parsing Awesome-Hacking-Spots markdown? #143

Alex-Keyes opened this issue Dec 4, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@Alex-Keyes
Copy link
Contributor

Do you guys have suggestions for coming with a good way to parse through this document? I don't want to change the format of anything since that means we won't be able to have new PRs updated in the document. I was wondering if anyone could recommend a way to proactively parse through the README

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Collaborator

Can you specify the requirements a bit more? wooorm/remark is one of the better markdown parsers out there, which may work for this, but there's a bit of a learning curve.

@Alex-Keyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alex-Keyes commented Dec 4, 2017 via email

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Collaborator

How does this improve on the browser's native search?

@Alex-Keyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alex-Keyes commented Dec 4, 2017 via email

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Collaborator

It looks like it should be trivial to implement their search directly. You can use basic regexes to search for cities with headings in the regex - ## Bogota, for instance, or just use plain text and see if our mileage varies.

Might be worth setting up a second GitHub repo for this, too. You could also use some GitHub database workflow, like opensourcedesign does, or octonews (unreleased, more work to do) will.

@Alex-Keyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alex-Keyes commented Dec 4, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants