Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error when updating token resource in 0.3.10 #280

Open
kpucynski opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 14 comments · May be fixed by #326
Open

Error when updating token resource in 0.3.10 #280

kpucynski opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 14 comments · May be fixed by #326
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@kpucynski
Copy link

Describe the bug

In the new provider version 0.3.10 updating dbtcloud_service_token resource is failing.

Error message

│ Error: Provider produced inconsistent result after apply
│ 
│ When applying changes to
│ dbtcloud_service_token.tokens["token_name"],
│ provider "provider[\"registry.terraform.io/dbt-labs/dbtcloud\"]" produced
│ an unexpected new value: .service_token_permissions: planned set element
│ cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{"all_projects":cty.False,
│ "permission_set":cty.StringVal("developer"),
│ "project_id":cty.NumberIntVal(3597),
│ "writable_environment_categories":cty.SetVal([]cty.Value{cty.StringVal("all")})})
│ does not correlate with any element in actual.
│ 
│ This is a bug in the provider, which should be reported in the provider's
│ own issue tracker.

Resource configuration

Service tokens are configured with the loop.
Affected token have around 50 project IDs assigned.

resource "dbtcloud_service_token" "tokens" {
  for_each = local.tokens

  name = each.key

  dynamic "service_token_permissions" {
    for_each = each.value
    content {
      permission_set = "developer"
      all_projects   = false
      project_id     = service_token_permissions.value
    }
  }

  dynamic "service_token_permissions" {
    for_each = each.value
    content {
      permission_set = "git_admin"
      all_projects   = false
      project_id     = service_token_permissions.value
    }
  }

  dynamic "service_token_permissions" {
    for_each = each.value
    content {
      permission_set = "job_admin"
      all_projects   = false
      project_id     = service_token_permissions.value
    }
  }
}

Expected behavior

Token updated in place.

Config (please complete the following information):

  • Installed dbt-labs/dbtcloud v0.3.10 (self-signed, key ID 644DCEA333782266)

Additional context

Downgrade to version 0.3.8 solves the problem and update is passing.

@kpucynski kpucynski added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 24, 2024
@kpucynski kpucynski changed the title Error when updating token resource on 0.3.10 Error when updating token resource in 0.3.10 Jul 24, 2024
@b-per
Copy link
Collaborator

b-per commented Jul 24, 2024

Thanks for the issue. We will try to reproduce it.

Could you please tell us what dbt Cloud tenant you are on? US MT, EMEA MT, ST (Single Tenant)?

@kpucynski
Copy link
Author

We are using EMEA: https://emea.dbt.com/api

@chasewalden
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @kpucynski . Looking into this now. This appears to be a bug with a new feature that is conditionally enabled.

@b-per
Copy link
Collaborator

b-per commented Aug 28, 2024

Do you still have an issue with the latest releases? It might have gone now as the env level permissions should be active for all accounts.

@b-per b-per added the Awaiting Response Waiting for response from reporter label Aug 28, 2024
@b-per
Copy link
Collaborator

b-per commented Sep 26, 2024

Closing for now. We can reopen if there is still an issue.

@b-per b-per closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 26, 2024
@kpucynski
Copy link
Author

kpucynski commented Nov 20, 2024

@b-per, We have just tested code with new 0.3.22 provider version and get the same issue:

│ Error: Provider produced inconsistent result after apply
│ 
│ When applying changes to
│ dbtcloud_service_token.dcrt_tokens["token"],
│ provider "provider[\"registry.terraform.io/dbt-labs/dbtcloud\"]" produced
│ an unexpected new value: .service_token_permissions: planned set element
│ cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{"all_projects":cty.False,
│ "permission_set":cty.StringVal("developer"),
│ "project_id":cty.NumberIntVal(3190),
│ "writable_environment_categories":cty.SetVal([]cty.Value{cty.StringVal("all")})})
│ does not correlate with any element in actual.
│ 
│ This is a bug in the provider, which should be reported in the provider's
│ own issue tracker.

@kpucynski
Copy link
Author

0.3.8 still no issues.

@kpucynski
Copy link
Author

@b-per can you reopen the issue?

@b-per b-per reopened this Dec 11, 2024
@b-per
Copy link
Collaborator

b-per commented Dec 11, 2024

I just reopened it but we haven't been able to reproduce it. We can try again.

@b-per
Copy link
Collaborator

b-per commented Dec 11, 2024

I just retried your code with 10 projects on the latest provider

locals {
  tokens = {
    "issue280": [
        1234,
        2345,
        ... (10 in total)
    ]
  }
}

And I can't reproduce the issue.
The token gets created and I can remove/add projects without a problem.

Could you please share your dbt Cloud Account ID?

@b-per
Copy link
Collaborator

b-per commented Dec 11, 2024

Good/Bad news. I created 40 projects on the fly and can now reproduce the issue when trying to assign permissions for 40 projects!

@b-per
Copy link
Collaborator

b-per commented Dec 11, 2024

@chasewalden

The issue here is that when a lot of permissions are assigned to a token, we don't return all of them and actually need to loop through the paginated results. So, we need to add pagination in GetServiceTokenPermissions.

func (c *Client) GetServiceTokenPermissions(serviceTokenID int) (*[]ServiceTokenPermission, error) {
req, err := http.NewRequest("GET", fmt.Sprintf("%s/v3/accounts/%s/service-tokens/%s/permissions/", c.HostURL, strconv.Itoa(c.AccountID), strconv.Itoa(serviceTokenID)), nil)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
body, err := c.doRequest(req)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
serviceTokenPermissionListResponse := ServiceTokenPermissionListResponse{}
err = json.Unmarshal(body, &serviceTokenPermissionListResponse)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return &serviceTokenPermissionListResponse.Data, nil
}

this is the reply we get when we query a token with more than 100 permissions

...
            "account_id": 1234,
            "all_projects": false,
            "created_at": "2024-12-11 13:45:57.925949+00:00",
            "id": 532831,
            "permission_set": "job_admin",
            "project_id": 1111,
            "service_token_id": 22222,
            "state": 1,
            "updated_at": "2024-12-11 13:45:57.925963+00:00",
            "writable_environment_categories": []
        }
    ],
    "error_code": null,
    "extra": {
        "filters": {
            "account_id": 1234,
            "limit": 100,
            "offset": 0,
            "service_token_id": 22222,
            "state": "active"
        },
        "order_by": null,
        "pagination": {
            "count": 100,
            "total_count": 120
        }
    },
    "status": {
        "code": 200,
        "developer_message": "",
        "is_success": true,
        "user_message": "Success!"
    }
}

I checked the permissions for groups and it looks that endpoints are slightly different so we might not have the same problem there.

Can you or the team work on a fix here or do you want me to do it?

@b-per b-per removed the Awaiting Response Waiting for response from reporter label Dec 11, 2024
@kpucynski
Copy link
Author

@b-per we have currently 52 projects on the problematic list, so one resource will create over 150 permissions.
I would like to not post any project related details here - ping me where(if) I can contact you with the details.

@b-per
Copy link
Collaborator

b-per commented Dec 13, 2024

Hi @kpucynski . All good. We have all the details to reproduce it so we don't need more inputs for now. We just need to implement the fix.

@ashtonwalden ashtonwalden linked a pull request Dec 13, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants