Replies: 2 comments
-
The configuration with an external STAC API would be quite different:
Some functionality would disappear, like dynamic mosaics based on STAC queries. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I hear this request more and more and for now I'm not sure what's the best approach Ideally, titiler-pgstac would be able to connect to any stac-api / stac-geoparquet but there are also custom parts specific to pgstac (search) which would be difficult to accommodate with non-pgstac backend |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
ESA EOEPCA wants to offer building blocks (to which eoapi-k8s contributes) in flexible configurations.
Some platforms may already have a STAC API and still want to use data access services (TiTiler, TiPg, TiTiler for multidimensional datasets) from eoAPI.
Or they only have little STAC data and do not need the full power of PgSTAC and rely on PyCSW's STAC API instead.
Should eoAPI-k8s offer a configuration / helm chart for "bring your own STAC API"?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions