You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 6, 2021. It is now read-only.
Hi there.
I made a number of random samplings of the full microsatellite list created with "scan". I am downsampling it to test if using a subset of the positions is still able to differentiate between high and low MSI samples. I'm seeing that even using a small number (10 thousand) positions I can easily differentiate the two groups of samples.
I have discovered something unusual though. For some reason, the high MSI cases get lower % MSI when I used more than 5000000 positions, and much higher when I use fewer positions.
Do you have any ideas of why higher numbers of positions for high MSI cases would not be in line with the lower counts of positions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there.
I made a number of random samplings of the full microsatellite list created with "scan". I am downsampling it to test if using a subset of the positions is still able to differentiate between high and low MSI samples. I'm seeing that even using a small number (10 thousand) positions I can easily differentiate the two groups of samples.
I have discovered something unusual though. For some reason, the high MSI cases get lower % MSI when I used more than 5000000 positions, and much higher when I use fewer positions.
Do you have any ideas of why higher numbers of positions for high MSI cases would not be in line with the lower counts of positions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: