We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There are two sets of underlying samplers in Rcpp.
Samplers returning a NumericVector are from Rcpp:: and those that return a double are from R::.
NumericVector
Rcpp::
double
R::
E.g.
rnorm(1, 2, 3) => R::rnorm(2.0, 3.0) rnorm(50, 2, 3) => Rcpp::rnorm(50, 2.0, 3.0)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think I would go with the Rcpp one for now - the least amount of work.
Rcpp
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
There are two sets of underlying samplers in Rcpp.
Samplers returning a
NumericVector
are fromRcpp::
and those that return adouble
are fromR::
.E.g.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: