id | title | desc | updated | created |
---|---|---|---|---|
inambqlxiimpcrwvuc5y8sk |
Annotated Hypergraphs Models and Applications |
networks cannot be represented by... dyadic graphs without a significant loss of model fidelity. |
1671367883655 |
1646285581088 |
- [[p.hasURL]] https://appliednetsci.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s41109-020-0252-y
- #summary
- In this article, we consider an important and relatively general class of metadata in which nodes are assigned roles in each edge
- [[p.hasSummaryPoints]]
- networks cannot be represented by via the classical paradigm of dyadic graphs without a significant loss of model fidelity.
- "Roles are assigned neither to nodes or to edges, but rather to node-edge pairs."
- [[p.provokedThoughts]]
- "edges in which the same node appears twice are not allowed"
- why not?
- seems like just for "experimental convenience"
- "It is difficult to find a modeling justification for hypergraphs with role-degenerate edges, but degenerate edges may have modeling applications"
- role-degenerate: same node v appears twice in e, with the same role.
- why not?
- "polyadic interactions" = "n-ary relations"
- "nodes of high degree tend to connect to other nodes of high degree"
- "edges in which the same node appears twice are not allowed"