You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have a workload that requires knowing the node's static IP.
This is fetched from the KubeIP at application startup.
However, we've observed that even when the taint has been removed, it can take a few minutes for the node's status to reflect the IP assignment.
This has led to our app binding to the old IP and causing connectivity issues later on.
Perhaps it was my misinterpretation of the Node Taints section in the readme, but I expected that when the taint was removed everything would be a-okay.
It is 💯 possible to remove the taint after the node's status reports the assigned address as I have hacked together something to test/confirm my theory above this afternoon.
It's not pretty and it's definitely lacking some tests, but I'll open a draft PR and link it to this issue after I click submit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have a workload that requires knowing the node's static IP.
This is fetched from the KubeIP at application startup.
However, we've observed that even when the taint has been removed, it can take a few minutes for the node's status to reflect the IP assignment.
This has led to our app binding to the old IP and causing connectivity issues later on.
Perhaps it was my misinterpretation of the Node Taints section in the readme, but I expected that when the taint was removed everything would be a-okay.
It is 💯 possible to remove the taint after the node's status reports the assigned address as I have hacked together something to test/confirm my theory above this afternoon.
It's not pretty and it's definitely lacking some tests, but I'll open a draft PR and link it to this issue after I click submit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: