Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add mouseover link text to concept values #46

Open
dret opened this issue Sep 30, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

add mouseover link text to concept values #46

dret opened this issue Sep 30, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@dret
Copy link
Owner

dret commented Sep 30, 2017

on concept pages, in the right-hand column of the table of values, the specification link does have the specification abstract as mouseover link text. it would be useful to have the concept value documentation text as mouseover link text in the left-hand column of the concept page tables.

@dret dret self-assigned this Sep 30, 2017
@dret
Copy link
Owner Author

dret commented Sep 30, 2017

http://webconcepts.info/concepts/link-relation/ and the second entry there (alternate) show a little complication: thereis a mouseover text used already, but only for those rare cases where there is more that one definition. this could probably be solved in a way different from a mouseover text, so that mouseover indeed could show the definition. but for more than one definition, one text would have to be picked, most likely right now simply the first one that is found (as there is no "preferred definition" as per #28).

dret added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2017
step one of addressing #46, making sure that the concept value
mouseover text can be used everywhere.
dret added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2017
this took much longer than it should have. MD is horrible. in this
case, escaping '<' in link tool tips seems to be necessary in jekyll,
even though it is not necessary in atom. it would be good to have a
proper function for MD output that handles all necessary escaping.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant