hasEstateOrDeathPutFeature wrongly modeled as a property of PutFeature #1405
Unanswered
rivettp
asked this question in
Securities (SEC)
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
See https://spec.edmcouncil.org/fibo/ontology/SEC/Debt/DebtInstruments/hasEstateOrDeathPutFeature
What does it mean for a https://spec.edmcouncil.org/fibo/ontology/SEC/Debt/DebtInstruments/PutFeature to itself have a PutFeature?
Regardless of the name of the property, reading its definition it seems like the domain of this property should be (a subclass of) Security, or it should not be a property at all but an individual of type https://spec.edmcouncil.org/fibo/ontology/SEC/Debt/DebtInstruments/TradableDebtInstrumentRedemptionProvision.
Compare with hasRightToRetain where it clearly is a property of the PutFeature.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions