Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execution Layer Meeting 205 #1271

Open
timbeiko opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 6 comments
Open

Execution Layer Meeting 205 #1271

timbeiko opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 6 comments
Labels
ACD Type: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensus Execution Layer: Issues that affect the execution layer

Comments

@timbeiko
Copy link
Contributor

timbeiko commented Jan 30, 2025

Meeting Info

Agenda

@shemnon
Copy link
Contributor

shemnon commented Jan 30, 2025

I'd like to discuss EIP-7666: EVMify the Identity Precompile, which is proposed for Fusaka. Specifically the mechanism of deploying a contract as a particular address as part of the fork transition.

The EOF team would like to use a similar mechanism for the TXCREATE mechanism that was part of the original EOF draft for Pectra. This could make it possible to retire Nick's method for deploying un-owned contracts at fixed addresses, especially cross-chain.

@marioevz
Copy link
Member

marioevz commented Feb 3, 2025

I'd like to add ethereum/EIPs#9290 to the agenda, because I think it's important to shed a light on how EELS and EEST fit into the EIP process.

@nixorokish nixorokish added ACD Type: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensus Execution Layer: Issues that affect the execution layer labels Feb 4, 2025
@kevaundray
Copy link

kevaundray commented Feb 6, 2025

I would like to discuss:

For Max blobs flag, barring input from L2s (rollcall is the day before) -- I would like to make a call for finalization

For hardware and bandwidth requirements -- same as above, if max blobs flag is okay. Still pending input from Nixo and Oisin re what percentage of annual rewards/capital investment should be used for determining the amount an attester should pay for hardware

@shemnon
Copy link
Contributor

shemnon commented Feb 10, 2025

I'd like to share the EOF devnet roadmap: https://notes.ethereum.org/oi698hfNTSG_oe9xHIgSaA

And as part of the roadmap add 4 EIPs to the "Proposed for Inclusion" list for Osaka: ethereum/EIPs#9352

  • EIP-7873: EOF - TXCREATE and InitcodeTransaction type
  • EIP-7834: Separate Metadata Section for EOF
  • EIP-7761: EXTCODETYPE instruction
  • EIP-TBD: EOF - EXTCODEADDRESS instruction

Aleneth added a commit to Aleneth/pm that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2025
@timbeiko
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shemnon I added your topics, but think we should go from highest to lowest level, so re-ordered them. @marioevz @kevaundray, I added your items to the agenda.

@abcoathup
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ACD Type: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensus Execution Layer: Issues that affect the execution layer
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants