Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How Does SparseConvNet Treat Active Sites Outside of the Stated Spatial Size of the Sparse Tensor? #199

Open
andrewcking opened this issue Nov 10, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@andrewcking
Copy link

I ran a small test with an input layer that had an active site outside of the stated spatial size of the sparse tensor. The input layer didn't complain and the network still provided an output for that value and did not omit it (which is good for my use case). Do I need to be ensuring that this does not occur or is this behavior occasionally okay to rely on? What implications does this have under the hood? I suppose the the question may be what is spatial_size used for internally?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant