Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support non-top-level partials #378

Open
1 task
alestiago opened this issue May 31, 2022 · 3 comments
Open
1 task

feat: support non-top-level partials #378

alestiago opened this issue May 31, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@alestiago
Copy link
Collaborator

alestiago commented May 31, 2022

Description

Allow partials to be placed elsewhere than directly under __brick__ directory.

Requirements

  • Allow partials not directly under __brick__
@felangel felangel added the enhancement New feature or request label May 31, 2022
alestiago pushed a commit to alestiago/mason that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2023
@talamaska
Copy link

talamaska commented Jun 21, 2023

Now, not to be picky, but the "Allow partials not under __brick__". To me sounds like somewhere outside of the __brick__ folder.
I would say that I want to be able to have partials working somewhere nested under __brick__, like
__brick__ > feature_name > bloc > here. Is this the same that this issue is requesting?

@felangel
Copy link
Owner

Now, not to be picky, but the "Allow partials not under __brick__". To me sounds like somewhere outside of the __brick__ folder. I would say that I want to be able to have partials working somewhere nested under __brick__, like __brick__ > feature_name > bloc > here. Is this the same that this issue is requesting?

Yes, I believe so. I believe this issue is requesting that partials be placed anywhere within the __brick__ directory (even in nested directories)

@talamaska
Copy link

But I think they still need to be on the same level of the template that is using them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants