Replies: 1 comment
-
There are two purposes of path handling in url_to_fs:
The latter point differs by filesystem. You notice, for instance, that localFS converts everything to posix-like, and may behave unexpectedly when the input is semi-posix on windows. HTTP-fs requires that the protocol be retained (because http and https are different), but most implementations drop the protocol. Also, if you has complex URLs like chains (simplecache::s3://bucket/file) or embedded parameters (ssh://user:pass@host:22/path/file) you would find only the "path" is returned, the rest having become arguments to the implementation class. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Why does the format of the path, returned by
url_to_fs
is so inconsistent depending on the file system and url format?And the output is:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions