-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
combineLatest #13
Comments
No, it is not intentional. Is just becase I have never needed it. PR welcome for adding it ;) |
I use it all the time. RxJS is pretty much useless for me without it :) OK, I will add it soon |
Take care that |
Nope, there is a difference (at least in RxJS 4.0 which I use routinely) :) If you use .combineLatest(a,b), both a and b could trigger combined signal [a,b] When using a.withLatestFrom(b), only new a could trigger combined signal [a,b], b is "passive" |
You are right! ;) |
OK, count me as officially stupid but I can't figure out how to run tests for your library. :cljsbuild { And receive What am I doing wrong? |
You can build and run tests in the same way as travis does: https://github.com/funcool/beicon/blob/master/.travis.yml#L4 |
I tried and it kinda started but It looks like I stumbled in a windows-specific problem :))) Do they have a facepalm emoji here? :) |
LOL |
Already implemented in master ;) |
I noticed that there is no wrapping method for combineLatest
Is this intentional and do you plan to keep it this way?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: