Support for rxjava 3

[D00mch]

Hey! Are you going to support rxjava 3.x?

[niwinz]

yep, i don't start working on it bu it is on the roadmap

[niwinz]

On the end I think that for the 6.0.0 I completly remove the clojure part.
I don't have a good uses cases for rxjava on jvm (having core.async and manifold). Handling backpressure in rxjava and clojure is... not idiomatic. It is not worh the effort of maintaining it.

On the cljs part i using it a lot on many projects and i want to focus on the real use case.

[jconti]

I would be sorry to lose support for beicon on the JVM, but I would not be sorry to loose rxjava. If it was all implemented with core.async, that would suit me fine. The expressiveness of reactive streams is superior to plain core.async IMO. And I think beicon.core/to-atom is superior to approaches that define "cells" with "automatic" updates. Just my 2 cents. Beicon is one of my favorite libraries.