-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Volume of Meshed object changed from CAD model #44
Comments
Thanks for posting, I wonder if the |
Thanks Jonathan, I have tired this method out and confusingly got a larger deviation from the expected. There are no errors but in OpenMC the error was not at the magnitude to make a difference to the results. The previous results were completed with a max mesh size of 6 and the newer results with a max mesh size of 2. Both with a minimum of 1.
I have been attempting some workarounds which include: I think if I could get the cubit plugin working this would be the most robust |
cubit now ships with dagmc included and no longer needs the plugin installing |
Hi All,
I have created a h5m model using the cad_to_dagmc conversion. It uses the DEMO model found in paramak. The layers of the blanket have been sliced into thin segments for better resolution of the neutronics in OpenMC. I have found a change in volume of the layers before and after the mesh that is up to 20% difference in some of the layers. I used CAD to give me the volumes of the objects before hand. I then converted the files to h5m and used OpenMC's stochastic volumes finder and found large differences between the two. There seems to be some issue when creating the mesh of the object. Any help or work around would be helpful. Below is the difference between the two measurements for each layer
OpenMC | FreeCAD | Percentage Diff
8832000 | 7985387 | 90.4142549818841
18238000 | 18305705 | 100.37123039807
20200000 | 18745010 | 92.7970792079208
19248000 | 19182706 | 99.6607751454697
21572000 | 19619631 | 90.9495225292045
24232000 | 20056649 | 82.7692679102014
24184000 | 20494116 | 84.7424578233543
23466000 | 20931891 | 89.2009332651496
23490000 | 21370217 | 90.9758067262665
25524000 | 21809467 | 85.446900955963
24600000 | 22249448 | 90.4449105691057
25080000 | 22690541 | 90.4726515151515
24934000 | 23133006 | 92.7769551616267
22920000 | 23577108 | 102.866963350785
22330000 | 24023068 | 107.582033139275
22372000 | 24470972 | 109.38213838727
22996000 | 24921086 | 108.371395025222
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: