You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Prepare for SDKs switching from transactions to sending only spans. SDKs will send spans from the same segment in one envelope, but no more transaction. There will be no true "span streaming" for now (which would allow SDKs to send arbitrary batches of spans beloning to different segments in the same envelope).
The content you are editing has changed. Please copy your edits and refresh the page.
As it seems, we will split work between Only Spans and Span Streaming. After talking to Armin, we'll most likely not start with span streaming within the next 12 months
jjbayer
changed the title
[EPIC] Span envelopes & span streaming
[EPIC] Support span envelopes
Sep 30, 2024
jjbayer
changed the title
[EPIC] Support span envelopes
[EPIC] Support span envelopes in Relay
Sep 30, 2024
@jjbayer I think #3299 does not belong in this issue, as it refers to standalone spans (span envelope item type), not the spans (name tbd, currently called otel_span) envelope item type
@stephanie-anderson internally, Relay converts all span item types to the same data structure, so the issue is still relevant. Currently the PII selector does not work on anything other than a span embedded in a transaction payload.
So far, we've referred to any span that's not embedded in a transaction payload as "standalone spans" in Relay. Should we avoid usage of "standalone spans" for this, is that name now reserved for something else?
Follow-up work to #2960.
Prepare for SDKs switching from transactions to sending only spans. SDKs will send spans from the same segment in one envelope, but no more transaction. There will be no true "span streaming" for now (which would allow SDKs to send arbitrary batches of spans beloning to different segments in the same envelope).
Segment envelopes
$span
PII selector should match standalone spans #3299span.segment_name
#3334span.segment_name
#3335The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: