Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider the Vercel Integration for Nextjs wizard #585

Open
scefali opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Consider the Vercel Integration for Nextjs wizard #585

scefali opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@scefali
Copy link
Contributor

scefali commented Jun 11, 2024

When you set up Sentry with Next.js using the wizard, there is a step asking about CI. It tries to get you to add the auth token to your CI provider but if you're using the Vercel integration, you don't need to do that because it handles it automatically. What should happen is it should ask you if you want to use the Vercel integration and open the page up for you to set that up. The mapping of the projects could also be done via the CLI after installation is complete, but that might be a bit harder. Either way, right now the wizard for Nextjs is written as if the Vercel integration doesn't exist.

@Lms24
Copy link
Member

Lms24 commented Jun 12, 2024

Hey, good suggestion! I have little to no context on the vercel integration but might be worth looking into. Also cc @lforst - thoughts?

@scefali
Copy link
Contributor Author

scefali commented Jun 13, 2024

@Lms24 It's basically a way of automatically setting the DSN (and other env variables) automatically. It does other things too but in this context that's what matters.

@getsantry getsantry bot moved this to Waiting for: Product Owner in GitHub Issues with 👀 3 Jun 13, 2024
@AbhiPrasad AbhiPrasad changed the title Consider the Verel Integration for Nextjs wizard Consider the Vercel Integration for Nextjs wizard Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants