You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The return result of birth-death seems like radius ($r$) rather than epsilon ($\epsilon=2r$), which doesn't keep the same representation of VR-complex.
When the radius reaches to 1.01666667 or 1.11803399, all 1--simplex(es) in Cech filtration (topological space?) looks have disappeared. So why larger radius are traced? Or do I have any misunderstanding of Cech filtration?
The figure with circle radius=1.01666667 is shown as follows.
where the orange edges are edges whose length <=the specific radius 1.01666667
I also tried the same point set in GUDHI 3.8(C++ version), and the output is as follows, which looks more reasonable.
So I guess if my understanding is right, the backend of CechComplex from GUDHI may need to be updated.
When using
EuclideanCechPersistence
to calculate persistence homology, the return result looks wrong.test code:
The return of
diag
is:The problems are:
The figure with circle radius=1.01666667 is shown as follows.
where the orange edges are edges whose length <=the specific radius 1.01666667
I also tried the same point set in
GUDHI
3.8(C++ version), and the output is as follows, which looks more reasonable.So I guess if my understanding is right, the backend of CechComplex from GUDHI may need to be updated.
with the core codes:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: