Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dose it work with the ZenWiFi XT9 #702

Open
DJkitty2 opened this issue Nov 9, 2024 · 9 comments
Open

dose it work with the ZenWiFi XT9 #702

DJkitty2 opened this issue Nov 9, 2024 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@DJkitty2
Copy link

DJkitty2 commented Nov 9, 2024

I own the ZenWiFi XT9 and I’m curious to know if there are any compatible versions or if there are any other options that work. Please let me know if I’ve overlooked something.

@DJkitty2 DJkitty2 added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 9, 2024
@James-s1126
Copy link

Same question here. +1

@X1pheR
Copy link

X1pheR commented Jan 3, 2025

Same. Hope it gets supported

@X1pheR
Copy link

X1pheR commented Jan 3, 2025

It actually looks like the XT8 and XT9 are identical except that the XT9 supports more channels. Somebody compared firmwares. See Source. Perhaps this would make it easier for @gnuton to also support the XT9 AKA XT8-PRO. 🤞🏻😅

@gnuton
Copy link
Owner

gnuton commented Jan 3, 2025

Hey,
I checked the configs and it looks like they build against the same SDK and same hardware (BCM53134) but they have different target profiles (947622GW vs 96756GW). I am not sure although much much compatible are the prebuilds.

This is from the target.mak
you can see there that they are different BCM53134 vs
export HND-947622_BASE := HND_ROUTER=y HND_ROUTER_AX_675X=y PROFILE="947622GW" ...
export RT-AX95Q := $(HND-947622_BASE)
export RT-AX95Q += BUILD_NAME="RT-AX95Q" SWITCH2="BCM53134"

export HND-96756_BASE := HND_ROUTER=y HND_ROUTER_AX_6756=y PROFILE="96756GW" ...
export XT8PRO := $(HND-96756_BASE)
export XT8PRO += BUILD_NAME="XT8PRO" SWITCH2="BCM53134" NVSIZE="128"

@X1pheR
Copy link

X1pheR commented Jan 3, 2025

Hey, I checked the configs and it looks like they build against the same SDK and same hardware (BCM53134) but they have different target profiles (947622GW vs 96756GW). I am not sure although much much compatible are the prebuilds.

This is from the target.mak you can see there that they are different BCM53134 vs export HND-947622_BASE := HND_ROUTER=y HND_ROUTER_AX_675X=y PROFILE="947622GW" ... export RT-AX95Q := $(HND-947622_BASE) export RT-AX95Q += BUILD_NAME="RT-AX95Q" SWITCH2="BCM53134"

export HND-96756_BASE := HND_ROUTER=y HND_ROUTER_AX_6756=y PROFILE="96756GW" ... export XT8PRO := $(HND-96756_BASE) export XT8PRO += BUILD_NAME="XT8PRO" SWITCH2="BCM53134" NVSIZE="128"

Thanks for the quick reply! So I guess this means that they can't be easily supported? I was hoping it would be easily supported as they looked identical and thus we would get XT9 support on Merlin. 😁

@gnuton
Copy link
Owner

gnuton commented Jan 3, 2025

I do not have access to XT9 GPL nor I do not have any hw, but I would guess it may be possible to hack something to get XT9 work with XT8 stuff we now have.

@gnuton gnuton self-assigned this Jan 3, 2025
@X1pheR
Copy link

X1pheR commented Jan 3, 2025

I do not have access to XT9 GPL nor I do not have any hw, but I would guess it may be possible to hack something to get XT9 work with XT8 stuff we now have.

That would be great! Is there any way I can help? I'm no programmer but have 2 XT9's in mesh I could run things on to provide info or such maybe.

@hbastos
Copy link

hbastos commented Jan 3, 2025 via email

@nschimme
Copy link

I was looking at how we integrated the XT8_V2 and noticed that there is extensive XT8PRO support already included as part of one of the previous merges: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Agnuton%2Fasuswrt-merlin.ng%20XT8PRO&type=code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants