The tone of this intro feels a little bit out of place here. It feels a lot more suited to the Getting Started or Introduction section, like it's trying to sell me on Godot in general. For the Manual section, we assume that the reader is at least vaguely aware of what Godot is and what it can do, and focus on grounded and technical information.

Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting out, Godot offers a friendly and intuitive environment to bring your game ideas to life.

I feel like if someone is already in the 2D Intro section, they don't need this kind of persuasive argument.

With its powerful yet accessible features, you'll have the freedom to unleash your creativity and create captivating gaming experiences.

Which features? This paragraph or a paragraph after it seem like a good place to mention the 2D features that Godot is actually really good at, tilemaps, particles, or the 2d lighting system.

So, get ready to embark on an adventure filled with endless possibilities and let your imagination soar as you dive into the wonderful realm of 2D game development with Godot!

This line felt especially out-of-place compared to the rest of this page.

I would try to make the intro a little more concise, maybe list some actual features, and make the tone a bit more grounded. I know this is rather vague feedback, so if you're not sure what to change I can write a revision of the paragraph as a starting point.

Another shot.

Note that it's not completely clear whether the preferred term is:

• "2D Workspace", as used here and in some other places in the docs
• "2D main screen", or "2D Editor", as used in the editor itself.

I'd be very happy using the terms "Workspaces" and "2D Workspace", but be aware we are setting some precedent here.

Is this then fine? 2D Workspace?

Yeah, this is fine as-is, you don't need to make changes.

I'm in favor of calling these workspaces. I just wanted to point out that it's a bit of an open discussion, and let anyone else comment if they cared.