-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Print information about globals #208
Labels
Comments
melver
referenced
this issue
in google/ktsan
Nov 4, 2019
Current code doesn't limit the number of nested devices. Nested devices would be handled recursively and this needs huge stack memory. So, unlimited nested devices could make stack overflow. This patch adds upper_level and lower_level, they are common variables and represent maximum lower/upper depth. When upper/lower device is attached or dettached, {lower/upper}_level are updated. and if maximum depth is bigger than 8, attach routine fails and returns -EMLINK. In addition, this patch converts recursive routine of netdev_walk_all_{lower/upper} to iterator routine. Test commands: ip link add dummy0 type dummy ip link add link dummy0 name vlan1 type vlan id 1 ip link set vlan1 up for i in {2..55} do let A=$i-1 ip link add vlan$i link vlan$A type vlan id $i done ip link del dummy0 Splat looks like: [ 155.513226][ T908] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __unwind_start+0x71/0x850 [ 155.514162][ T908] Write of size 88 at addr ffff8880608a6cc0 by task ip/908 [ 155.515048][ T908] [ 155.515333][ T908] CPU: 0 PID: 908 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.4.0-rc3+ #96 [ 155.516147][ T908] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 155.517233][ T908] Call Trace: [ 155.517627][ T908] [ 155.517918][ T908] Allocated by task 0: [ 155.518412][ T908] (stack is not available) [ 155.518955][ T908] [ 155.519228][ T908] Freed by task 0: [ 155.519885][ T908] (stack is not available) [ 155.520452][ T908] [ 155.520729][ T908] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8880608a6ac0 [ 155.520729][ T908] which belongs to the cache names_cache of size 4096 [ 155.522387][ T908] The buggy address is located 512 bytes inside of [ 155.522387][ T908] 4096-byte region [ffff8880608a6ac0, ffff8880608a7ac0) [ 155.523920][ T908] The buggy address belongs to the page: [ 155.524552][ T908] page:ffffea0001822800 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff88806c657cc0 index:0x0 compound_mapcount:0 [ 155.525836][ T908] flags: 0x100000000010200(slab|head) [ 155.526445][ T908] raw: 0100000000010200 ffffea0001813808 ffffea0001a26c08 ffff88806c657cc0 [ 155.527424][ T908] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000070007 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 155.528429][ T908] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [ 155.529158][ T908] [ 155.529410][ T908] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 155.530060][ T908] ffff8880608a6b80: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 155.530971][ T908] ffff8880608a6c00: fb fb fb fb fb f1 f1 f1 f1 00 f2 f2 f2 f3 f3 f3 [ 155.531889][ T908] >ffff8880608a6c80: f3 fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 155.532806][ T908] ^ [ 155.533509][ T908] ffff8880608a6d00: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 [ 155.534436][ T908] ffff8880608a6d80: f2 f3 f3 f3 f3 fb fb fb 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ ... ] Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
melver
referenced
this issue
in google/ktsan
Nov 4, 2019
The IFF_BONDING means bonding master or bonding slave device. ->ndo_add_slave() sets IFF_BONDING flag and ->ndo_del_slave() unsets IFF_BONDING flag. bond0<--bond1 Both bond0 and bond1 are bonding device and these should keep having IFF_BONDING flag until they are removed. But bond1 would lose IFF_BONDING at ->ndo_del_slave() because that routine do not check whether the slave device is the bonding type or not. This patch adds the interface type check routine before removing IFF_BONDING flag. Test commands: ip link add bond0 type bond ip link add bond1 type bond ip link set bond1 master bond0 ip link set bond1 nomaster ip link del bond1 type bond ip link add bond1 type bond Splat looks like: [ 226.665555] proc_dir_entry 'bonding/bond1' already registered [ 226.666440] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 737 at fs/proc/generic.c:361 proc_register+0x2a9/0x3e0 [ 226.667571] Modules linked in: bonding af_packet sch_fq_codel ip_tables x_tables unix [ 226.668662] CPU: 0 PID: 737 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.4.0-rc3+ #96 [ 226.669508] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 226.670652] RIP: 0010:proc_register+0x2a9/0x3e0 [ 226.671612] Code: 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 39 01 00 00 48 8b 04 24 48 89 ea 48 c7 c7 a0 0b 14 9f 48 8b b0 e 0 00 00 00 e8 07 e7 88 ff <0f> 0b 48 c7 c7 40 2d a5 9f e8 59 d6 23 01 48 8b 4c 24 10 48 b8 00 [ 226.675007] RSP: 0018:ffff888050e17078 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 226.675761] RAX: dffffc0000000008 RBX: ffff88805fdd0f10 RCX: ffffffff9dd344e2 [ 226.676757] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff88806c9f6b8c [ 226.677751] RBP: ffff8880507160f3 R08: ffffed100d940019 R09: ffffed100d940019 [ 226.678761] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed100d940018 R12: ffff888050716008 [ 226.679757] R13: ffff8880507160f2 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffffed100a0e2c1e [ 226.680758] FS: 00007fdc217cc0c0(0000) GS:ffff88806c800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 226.681886] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 226.682719] CR2: 00007f49313424d0 CR3: 0000000050e46001 CR4: 00000000000606f0 [ 226.683727] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 226.684725] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 226.685681] Call Trace: [ 226.687089] proc_create_seq_private+0xb3/0xf0 [ 226.687778] bond_create_proc_entry+0x1b3/0x3f0 [bonding] [ 226.691458] bond_netdev_event+0x433/0x970 [bonding] [ 226.692139] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 226.692779] notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 226.693401] register_netdevice+0x9b3/0xd80 [ 226.694010] ? alloc_netdev_mqs+0x854/0xc10 [ 226.694629] ? netdev_change_features+0xa0/0xa0 [ 226.695278] ? rtnl_create_link+0x2ed/0xad0 [ 226.695849] bond_newlink+0x2a/0x60 [bonding] [ 226.696422] __rtnl_newlink+0xb9f/0x11b0 [ 226.696968] ? rtnl_link_unregister+0x220/0x220 [ ... ] Fixes: 0b680e7 ("[PATCH] bonding: Add priv_flag to avoid event mishandling") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
melver
referenced
this issue
in google/ktsan
Nov 4, 2019
All bonding device has same lockdep key and subclass is initialized with nest_level. But actual nest_level value can be changed when a lower device is attached. And at this moment, the subclass should be updated but it seems to be unsafe. So this patch makes bonding use dynamic lockdep key instead of the subclass. Test commands: ip link add bond0 type bond for i in {1..5} do let A=$i-1 ip link add bond$i type bond ip link set bond$i master bond$A done ip link set bond5 master bond0 Splat looks like: [ 307.992912] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 307.993656] 5.4.0-rc3+ #96 Tainted: G W [ 307.994367] -------------------------------------------- [ 307.995092] ip/761 is trying to acquire lock: [ 307.995710] ffff8880513aac60 (&(&bond->stats_lock)->rlock#2/2){+.+.}, at: bond_get_stats+0xb8/0x500 [bonding] [ 307.997045] but task is already holding lock: [ 307.997923] ffff88805fcbac60 (&(&bond->stats_lock)->rlock#2/2){+.+.}, at: bond_get_stats+0xb8/0x500 [bonding] [ 307.999215] other info that might help us debug this: [ 308.000251] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 308.001137] CPU0 [ 308.001533] ---- [ 308.001915] lock(&(&bond->stats_lock)->rlock#2/2); [ 308.002609] lock(&(&bond->stats_lock)->rlock#2/2); [ 308.003302] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 308.004310] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 308.005319] 3 locks held by ip/761: [ 308.005830] #0: ffffffff9fcc42b0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x466/0x8a0 [ 308.006894] #1: ffff88805fcbac60 (&(&bond->stats_lock)->rlock#2/2){+.+.}, at: bond_get_stats+0xb8/0x500 [bonding] [ 308.008243] #2: ffffffff9f9219c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: bond_get_stats+0x9f/0x500 [bonding] [ 308.009422] stack backtrace: [ 308.010124] CPU: 0 PID: 761 Comm: ip Tainted: G W 5.4.0-rc3+ #96 [ 308.011097] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 308.012179] Call Trace: [ 308.012601] dump_stack+0x7c/0xbb [ 308.013089] __lock_acquire+0x269d/0x3de0 [ 308.013669] ? register_lock_class+0x14d0/0x14d0 [ 308.014318] lock_acquire+0x164/0x3b0 [ 308.014858] ? bond_get_stats+0xb8/0x500 [bonding] [ 308.015520] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x2e/0x60 [ 308.016129] ? bond_get_stats+0xb8/0x500 [bonding] [ 308.017215] bond_get_stats+0xb8/0x500 [bonding] [ 308.018454] ? bond_arp_rcv+0xf10/0xf10 [bonding] [ 308.019710] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x90/0xa0 [ 308.020605] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xc0/0xc0 [ 308.021286] ? bond_get_stats+0x9f/0x500 [bonding] [ 308.021953] dev_get_stats+0x1ec/0x270 [ 308.022508] bond_get_stats+0x1d1/0x500 [bonding] Fixes: d3fff6c ("net: add netdev_lockdep_set_classes() helper") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
melver
referenced
this issue
in google/ktsan
Nov 4, 2019
team interface could be nested and it's lock variable could be nested too. But this lock uses static lockdep key and there is no nested locking handling code such as mutex_lock_nested() and so on. so the Lockdep would warn about the circular locking scenario that couldn't happen. In order to fix, this patch makes the team module to use dynamic lock key instead of static key. Test commands: ip link add team0 type team ip link add team1 type team ip link set team0 master team1 ip link set team0 nomaster ip link set team1 master team0 ip link set team1 nomaster Splat that looks like: [ 40.364352] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 40.364964] 5.4.0-rc3+ #96 Not tainted [ 40.365405] -------------------------------------------- [ 40.365973] ip/750 is trying to acquire lock: [ 40.366542] ffff888060b34c40 (&team->lock){+.+.}, at: team_set_mac_address+0x151/0x290 [team] [ 40.367689] but task is already holding lock: [ 40.368729] ffff888051201c40 (&team->lock){+.+.}, at: team_del_slave+0x29/0x60 [team] [ 40.370280] other info that might help us debug this: [ 40.371159] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 40.371942] CPU0 [ 40.372338] ---- [ 40.372673] lock(&team->lock); [ 40.373115] lock(&team->lock); [ 40.373549] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 40.374432] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 40.375338] 2 locks held by ip/750: [ 40.375851] #0: ffffffffabcc42b0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x466/0x8a0 [ 40.376927] #1: ffff888051201c40 (&team->lock){+.+.}, at: team_del_slave+0x29/0x60 [team] [ 40.377989] stack backtrace: [ 40.378650] CPU: 0 PID: 750 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.4.0-rc3+ #96 [ 40.379368] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 40.380574] Call Trace: [ 40.381208] dump_stack+0x7c/0xbb [ 40.381959] __lock_acquire+0x269d/0x3de0 [ 40.382817] ? register_lock_class+0x14d0/0x14d0 [ 40.383784] ? check_chain_key+0x236/0x5d0 [ 40.384518] lock_acquire+0x164/0x3b0 [ 40.385074] ? team_set_mac_address+0x151/0x290 [team] [ 40.385805] __mutex_lock+0x14d/0x14c0 [ 40.386371] ? team_set_mac_address+0x151/0x290 [team] [ 40.387038] ? team_set_mac_address+0x151/0x290 [team] [ 40.387632] ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1380/0x1380 [ 40.388245] ? team_del_slave+0x60/0x60 [team] [ 40.388752] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x90/0xc0 [ 40.389304] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xa0/0xa0 [ 40.389819] ? lock_acquire+0x164/0x3b0 [ 40.390285] ? lockdep_rtnl_is_held+0x16/0x20 [ 40.390797] ? team_port_get_rtnl+0x90/0xe0 [team] [ 40.391353] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 40.391886] ? team_set_mac_address+0x151/0x290 [team] [ 40.392547] team_set_mac_address+0x151/0x290 [team] [ 40.393111] dev_set_mac_address+0x1f0/0x3f0 [ ... ] Fixes: 3d249d4 ("net: introduce ethernet teaming device") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
melver
referenced
this issue
in google/ktsan
Nov 4, 2019
virt_wifi_newlink() calls netdev_upper_dev_link() and it internally holds reference count of lower interface. Current code does not release a reference count of the lower interface when the lower interface is being deleted. So, reference count leaks occur. Test commands: ip link add dummy0 type dummy ip link add vw1 link dummy0 type virt_wifi ip link del dummy0 Splat looks like: [ 133.787526][ T788] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 788 at net/core/dev.c:8274 rollback_registered_many+0x835/0xc80 [ 133.788355][ T788] Modules linked in: virt_wifi cfg80211 dummy team af_packet sch_fq_codel ip_tables x_tables unix [ 133.789377][ T788] CPU: 1 PID: 788 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.4.0-rc3+ #96 [ 133.790069][ T788] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 133.791167][ T788] RIP: 0010:rollback_registered_many+0x835/0xc80 [ 133.791906][ T788] Code: 00 4d 85 ff 0f 84 b5 fd ff ff ba c0 0c 00 00 48 89 de 4c 89 ff e8 9b 58 04 00 48 89 df e8 30 [ 133.794317][ T788] RSP: 0018:ffff88805ba3f338 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 133.795080][ T788] RAX: ffff88805e57e801 RBX: ffff88805ba34000 RCX: ffffffffa9294723 [ 133.796045][ T788] RDX: 1ffff1100b746816 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffffffffabcc4240 [ 133.797006][ T788] RBP: ffff88805ba3f4c0 R08: fffffbfff5798849 R09: fffffbfff5798849 [ 133.797993][ T788] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: fffffbfff5798848 R12: dffffc0000000000 [ 133.802514][ T788] R13: ffff88805ba3f440 R14: ffff88805ba3f400 R15: ffff88805ed622c0 [ 133.803237][ T788] FS: 00007f2e9608c0c0(0000) GS:ffff88806cc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 133.804002][ T788] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 133.804664][ T788] CR2: 00007f2e95610603 CR3: 000000005f68c004 CR4: 00000000000606e0 [ 133.805363][ T788] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 133.806073][ T788] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 133.806787][ T788] Call Trace: [ 133.807069][ T788] ? generic_xdp_install+0x310/0x310 [ 133.807612][ T788] ? lock_acquire+0x164/0x3b0 [ 133.808077][ T788] ? is_bpf_text_address+0x5/0xf0 [ 133.808640][ T788] ? deref_stack_reg+0x9c/0xd0 [ 133.809138][ T788] ? __nla_validate_parse+0x98/0x1ab0 [ 133.809944][ T788] unregister_netdevice_many.part.122+0x13/0x1b0 [ 133.810599][ T788] rtnl_delete_link+0xbc/0x100 [ 133.811073][ T788] ? rtnl_af_register+0xc0/0xc0 [ 133.811672][ T788] rtnl_dellink+0x30e/0x8a0 [ 133.812205][ T788] ? is_bpf_text_address+0x5/0xf0 [ ... ] [ 144.110530][ T788] unregister_netdevice: waiting for dummy0 to become free. Usage count = 1 This patch adds notifier routine to delete upper interface before deleting lower interface. Fixes: c7cdba3 ("mac80211-next: rtnetlink wifi simulation device") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
If a race happens on global, we need to print description of the global: name, address, size, offset.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: