Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
ack-- i restarted the above poll, as I took another look, and saw all the "others", and realized that the question wording was off. please still feel free to respond with other, and please feel free to add feedback to the discussion linked above no matter how you vote. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks again to all who voted! Please add your feedback as well to the linked discussion above. @graphql/tsc @graphql/implementers @graphql/wg-core |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Repeating the call — please add your reason for your vote to the linked discussion above. A bit of feedback prior to the next meeting would probably make the next WG discussion on this topic much more impactful. @graphql/tsc @graphql/implementers @graphql/wg-core |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Cross-posting poll from graphql/defer-stream-wg#38 (comment) for greater visibility. Please vote only once for this question from either github repo, as results are linked.
Note: I restarted this poll, as I think the question wording was off.
For resolvers that return async iterables, what should the async iterable yield?
Next Available Value
Next Set of Available Values
Other
For Other, please add your comments to the discussion linked above!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions