Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Windy #17

Open
iamnunocaldeira opened this issue Feb 14, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Windy #17

iamnunocaldeira opened this issue Feb 14, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
Missing completely No attribution at all Not substantial Not Substantial usage as defined by OSMF substantial guidelines question Further information is requested

Comments

@iamnunocaldeira
Copy link
Collaborator

When adding an usage of OpenStreetMap data where the attribution isn't correct, please provide the following information. Otherwise, delete the text and type your issue.

Description

None of the apps have attribution. Several attempts asking for attribution since 2016
https://community.windy.com/topic/3353/map-correction/15

Type

App

URL of the usage, if online. Otherwise, where to find it.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.windyty.android
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=cz.seznam.windymaps

How to reproduce

install both apps and check there's no attribution

Approximate size of the map displayed

full screen

Screenshot

https://twitter.com/iamnunocaldeira/status/1209478127279325185
Use the little cloud with the arrow at the top right of this form, or put an URL here

Usage is substantial

( see https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Substantial_-_Guideline )

no

Attribution is:

Completely absent

Contact with author

Name of author or company name

Detail of contact

https://community.windy.com/topic/3353/map-correction/16

Actions already taken

Company doesn't comply with the community requests. OSMF as the licensor should write them a letter

@grischard grischard added Missing completely No attribution at all Not substantial Not Substantial usage as defined by OSMF substantial guidelines question Further information is requested labels Feb 16, 2020
@grischard
Copy link
Owner

Why do you think it's not substantial?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Missing completely No attribution at all Not substantial Not Substantial usage as defined by OSMF substantial guidelines question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants