You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been scouring the ppaml emails that I kept (not all) to find what
each rmProgi (for i = 1..4) were. rmProg1 is 'easier roadmap', rmProg2
is obtained by disintegration (and simplification?), etc. Seems there
was a step in there involving mh.
Now that things work a lot better, it would be nice to have this as a
'system test' to ensure that our pipeline works. I guess this is an
example in the most recent paper that Rob talked about? Could we get
enough information to turn it (and the other examples) into actual tests?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've been scouring the ppaml emails that I kept (not all) to find what
each rmProgi (for i = 1..4) were. rmProg1 is 'easier roadmap', rmProg2
is obtained by disintegration (and simplification?), etc. Seems there
was a step in there involving mh.
Now that things work a lot better, it would be nice to have this as a
'system test' to ensure that our pipeline works. I guess this is an
example in the most recent paper that Rob talked about? Could we get
enough information to turn it (and the other examples) into actual tests?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: