Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

documenting the rmProg family #86

Open
JacquesCarette opened this issue Jun 15, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

documenting the rmProg family #86

JacquesCarette opened this issue Jun 15, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@JacquesCarette
Copy link
Contributor

I've been scouring the ppaml emails that I kept (not all) to find what
each rmProgi (for i = 1..4) were. rmProg1 is 'easier roadmap', rmProg2
is obtained by disintegration (and simplification?), etc. Seems there
was a step in there involving mh.

Now that things work a lot better, it would be nice to have this as a
'system test' to ensure that our pipeline works. I guess this is an
example in the most recent paper that Rob talked about? Could we get
enough information to turn it (and the other examples) into actual tests?

@ccshan
Copy link
Member

ccshan commented Jun 15, 2017

Yeah, Section 3 of ppaml/writing/multi.tex should document this pipeline. It welcomes your feedback.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants