-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Call for maintainer(s) #218
Comments
Which feature do people demand? Departing from RFC 4180 seems a choice with some risks. |
This was referenced Feb 20, 2023
Hi. Are you still looking for a maintainer or at least a contributor? I'm working on a dataframe library. Was initially hesitant to use cassava because I wanted more control over memory footprint but it's worth consolidating the effort. |
Let us ping @andreasabel in case just to make sure he sees this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This package could benefit from an active maintainer. I am only a steward, keeping things working in the latest Haskell ecosystem.
However, there some requests for feature extensions. These mostly depart from RFC 4180 which
cassava
is dedicated to. To make progress with such issues, one would need a fundamental decision in which direction this package should develop.I'd like to leave this decision with a new maintainer or maintainer consortium.
I propose a search for new maintainer(s). If you are interested in maintaining, please apply by answering to this issue. You may also add a short resume explaining your interest in
cassava
and a summary of your maintainer experience for Haskell projects.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: