You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Linked to the PR #2180 that changed the way base_alti is handled, we noticed a difference in the representation of object in the 3D environnement.
Take the examples source_file_gpx_raster and source_file_gpx_3d that both use a gpx file to draw it on a itowns scene. The first one project it on the raster layer when the second one draw it as a mesh. We exept the 2 way to show very similar view.
Or (already before) that's not the case moreover the newly merge PR make it even more different (see example following)
On master before merge:
tilt: 45
tilt: 0 (Nadir)
On master after merge:
tilt: 45
tilt: 0 (Nadir)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Linked to the PR #2180 that changed the way base_alti is handled, we noticed a difference in the representation of object in the 3D environnement.
Take the examples source_file_gpx_raster and source_file_gpx_3d that both use a gpx file to draw it on a itowns scene. The first one project it on the raster layer when the second one draw it as a mesh. We exept the 2 way to show very similar view.
Or (already before) that's not the case moreover the newly merge PR make it even more different (see example following)
On master before merge:


tilt: 45
tilt: 0 (Nadir)
On master after merge:


tilt: 45
tilt: 0 (Nadir)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: