-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename ihm_ensemble_info
category
#105
Comments
this definition contradicts the current model for crosslinking-MS data. we've discussed and agreed on:
if it's simply a group of models, shouldn't they be just left as a model group? |
as Brinda pointed out, in the IHMCIF paper we wrote:
However, multi-state treatment is an explicit choice in the modeling process. One can model the system as a single state and get a collection of structural models that collectively describe the system (like an IDR ensemble). Also, in the IHMCIF paper we don't mention ensembles at all. @jaredsagendorf do you have a good definition for the ensemble? |
Also, I just realized that PDBDEV_00000008 is missing from the list. Shouldn't it be a canonical example for the ensemble, where each model has a relatively poor fit to the data but the collection as a whole fits the data well? |
The term
ensemble
is used differently by different communities.In IHMCIF, we want to consider these as a "collection of models" that individually satisfy the input data within a threshold rather than as ensembles.
Consider renaming
ihm_ensemble_info
accordingly and update category and item descriptions to reflect the change.List of released entries with
ihm_ensemble_info
populated (June 19, 2024):The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: