Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gauge should use tickPrefix as a literal string in front of ticks #253

Open
3 tasks done
TCL735 opened this issue May 19, 2021 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks done

Gauge should use tickPrefix as a literal string in front of ticks #253

TCL735 opened this issue May 19, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working Template Issue A problem with a specific Template

Comments

@TCL735
Copy link

TCL735 commented May 19, 2021

Template: multiple

Describe the problem
Gauge treats the tickPrefix property as a literal string. And this is the correct behavior.

If "false" is the value, then "false" is literally the value that will appear in front of each tick on the Gauge.

Please update all templates' tickPrefix to ensure that no undesired strings are given as the value.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Search the entire repository's files for the word tickPrefix

Expected behavior
tickPrefix should be removed if "false" is not the desired prefix.

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

How are you running InfluxDB?

  • InfluxDB Cloud platform
  • InfluxDB 2.0 on a remote server
  • InfluxDB 2.0 on my local machine

Additional context

@TCL735 TCL735 added bug Something isn't working Template Issue A problem with a specific Template labels May 19, 2021
@TCL735 TCL735 changed the title Gauge uses tickPrefix as a literal string in front of ticks Gauge should use tickPrefix as a literal string in front of ticks May 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working Template Issue A problem with a specific Template
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants