You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 13, 2023. It is now read-only.
In some cases, nodes must work for their blocks. In the case that a node has nothing that its peers want (or nothing at all), it seeks the pieces its peers want, with lower priority than what the node wants itself. This incentivizes nodes to cache and disseminate rare pieces, even if they are not interested in them directly.
When I read that I got concerned about legal issues of just blindly and automatically downloading content from peers. In ipfs-inactive/faq#47 I then read design goals and answer to "but bitswap says it may download stuff for others, to do better?" which is a good read.
I would suggest that both design goals and those questions and answers in some form are added to the paper. Design goals somewhere early on.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Agree.. There is some misinformation going around based on the paper, which might have significant PR (not pull requests :)) issues.. and may cause issues with adoption..
In the current draft of the paper, it is written:
When I read that I got concerned about legal issues of just blindly and automatically downloading content from peers. In ipfs-inactive/faq#47 I then read design goals and answer to "but bitswap says it may download stuff for others, to do better?" which is a good read.
I would suggest that both design goals and those questions and answers in some form are added to the paper. Design goals somewhere early on.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: