You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2024. It is now read-only.
Above all, I feel appreciate to your answer, and I have some question about the Initial of data?
How can I pick up match-point from two different cloud? I try this by curvature, But the result is not good. Dose this algorithm can adapt to different cloud? Could you give me some direction. Thank you!
I am not sure whether I completely understood your question, but let me try one by one.
How can I pick up match-point from two different cloud? I try this by curvature, But the result is not good.
You don't have to match points by yourself. As shown in README.md, all you need to do is put xyz+geometric feature for the pipeline.
Dose this algorithm can adapt to different cloud?
Depends on the cases. FGR is tested on the noisy point clouds as well, but If the two point clouds are quite different (captured by different sensors, almost no overlapping, or density is not the same) it can suffer. See the discussion #5#6.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
If the cloud's number are difference, Should I do the matching work?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: