We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
main
I noticed that the semantic kitti dataset in ml3d/datasets/semantickitti.py drops any non coordinate features (which would include the intensity).
ml3d/datasets/semantickitti.py
Which seems odd. I've included it in a PR. And tested it against some labels with associated intensities on a flat plan.
With feat: None. It's forced to hallucinate. With feat set to remaining point data. It accurately describes the areas after a few cycles.
Notably. The testing for this was done with three datasets for training that hold these labels in geometrically random locations.
Then tested against a forth - entirely unseen - dataset.
No intensity entering model:
Adding feature to remaining point coords:
Just train on an intensity based sample in which no correlation exists between label and location. Something like a flat plan with areas of differing intensity.
No response
Features should be allowed into the model.
Based on this commit: `c4cbf85 2024-10-08 08:40 -0700 Sameer Sheorey o Python 3.12 support (#657)`
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Checklist
main
branch).Describe the issue
I noticed that the semantic kitti dataset in
ml3d/datasets/semantickitti.py
drops any non coordinate features (which would include the intensity).Which seems odd. I've included it in a PR. And tested it against some labels with associated intensities on a flat plan.
With feat: None. It's forced to hallucinate. With feat set to remaining point data. It accurately describes the areas after a few cycles.
Notably. The testing for this was done with three datasets for training that hold these labels in geometrically random locations.
Then tested against a forth - entirely unseen - dataset.
No intensity entering model:
Adding feature to remaining point coords:
Steps to reproduce the bug
Error message
No response
Expected behavior
Features should be allowed into the model.
Open3D, Python and System information
Additional information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: