You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice to use atomic types smaller than usize for tracking variables. This could be a significant size savings for buffers like BBBuffer<U128> (18 bytes vs 6 bytes overhead on a 32-bit target).
This should be possible by following the tricks used by heapless, and could be made backwards compatible to alias current constructors to use usize as the generic parameter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be nice to use atomic types smaller than
usize
for tracking variables. This could be a significant size savings for buffers likeBBBuffer<U128>
(18 bytes vs 6 bytes overhead on a 32-bit target).This should be possible by following the tricks used by
heapless
, and could be made backwards compatible to alias current constructors to useusize
as the generic parameter.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: