-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
/
Copy pathdifferences.yaml
2513 lines (2508 loc) · 87 KB
/
differences.yaml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
αββα:
ἀββα:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
ἀββά:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- BDAG has breathing but no accent
- Danker CL and Mounce have ἀββά
- SBLGNT doesn't accent Αββα so it would be consistent for the lemma not to be accented either (although should it be capitalized?)
Ἅβελ:
Ἇβελ:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
comment:
- any basis for Mounce's accentuation? check if it was a mistake in my original conversion to UTF-8
Ἅγαβος:
Ἇγαβος:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
comment:
- any basis for Mounce's accentuation? check if it was a mistake in my original conversion to UTF-8
ἀγαθουργέω:
ἀγαθοεργέω:
tags: ["οε contraction"]
sources: ["danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- BDAG has contracted form ου but Danker CL and Mounce have οε
ἄγε:
ἄγω:
tags: []
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
comment:
- interjection from present imperative of ἄγω
- Mounce must just treats this as ἄγω
- BDAG and Danker CL have a separate entry for it
αἶνος:
αὶνος:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
comment:
- this is just a bad accentuation in Mounce (likely as a result of my conversion to UTF-8)
αἱρέομαι:
αἱρέω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only in middle form in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active αἱρέω as headword
αἰσχύνομαι:
αἰσχύνη:
tags: ["η/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry"]
comment:
- αἰσχύνη is a noun
- αἰσχύνομαι is a verb (in Danker CL as αἰσχύνω)
- lexemes.yaml is likely just wrong
αἴτιον:
αἴτιος:
tags: ["ον/ος"]
sources: ["danker-entry", "mounce-headword", "bdag-headword"]
comment:
- Danker CL (and likely BDAG and Mounce) treat αἴτιος and αἴτιον as same lexeme
- entry in Danker CL suggests a difference in meaning that should be reflected in our analysis
- Danker CL suggests:
- Lk 23:4 is neuter (we have neuter but αἴτιος)
- Lk 23:22 is neuter? (we have neuter but αἴτιος)
- Ac 19:40 is neuter (we have neuter and αἴτιον)
- Hb 5:9 is masculine (we have masculine and αἴτιος)
- Danker CL does not comment on Lk 23:14
ἀκριβέστερον:
ἀκριβῶς:
tags: ["-τερον"]
sources: ["danker-entry", "bdag-headword", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- ἀκριβέστερον is the comparative of ἀκριβῶς and neither BDAG nor Danker CL treat it as a separate lexeme
- our analysis is inconsistent in adverb vs adjective (treating ἀκριβέστερον as an adjective 3 times and adverb once)
ἅλα:
ἅλας:
tags: ["movable ς"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- Danker CL favours ἅλας as headword, giving older form ἅλα as a variant
ἀλάβαστρον:
ἀλάβαστρος:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
comment:
- Danker CL combines both masculine/feminine and neuter entries into one (this being the latter)
ἀλυπότερος:
ἄλυπος:
tags: ["-τερος"]
sources: ["danker-entry", "bdag-headword", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- ἀλυπότερος is the comparative of ἄλυπος and neither BDAG nor Danker CL treat it as a separate lexeme
Ἄλφα:
ἄλφα:
tags: ["case"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- BDAG and Danker CL prefer the lowercase spelling but in our analysis we're just following the text itself
ἀμάρτυρος:
ἁμάρτυρος:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- our text has smooth breathing
- Danker CL has rough breathing (and doesn't mention possibility of smooth)
- BDAG has smooth. What made Danker change his mind?
ἀμύνομαι:
ἀμύνω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- Danker CL (as it often seems to) favours the active form ἀμύνω even against BDAG
ἀμφιέννυμι:
ἀμφιέζω:
tags: ["ννυμι/ζω"]
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
comment:
- Mounce has the newer ἀμφιέζω (which is a separate entry in Danker CL) but not used in our analysis
ἄν:
<missing>:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
comment:
- missing from my BDAG headword list so I need to check with printed BDAG
ἀναβάλλομαι:
ἀναβάλλω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only in middle form in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active ἀναβάλλω as headword
ἀναγνωρίζομαι:
ἀναγνωρίζω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only in middle form in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active ἀναγνωρίζω as headword
ἀναλίσκω:
ἀναλόω:
tags: ["όω/ίσκω"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- Danker CL calls ἀναλόω a by-form of ἀναλίσκω and says that all forms in our text come from ἀναλόω
ἀνανεόω:
ἀνανεόομαι:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text, Danker CL has gone with middle headword but BDAG and Mounce prefer active ἀνανεόω as headword, which is what our analysis uses
ἀνάπηρος:
ἀνάπειρος:
tags: ["ει/η"]
sources: ["danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- Danker CL calls ἀνάπειρος a by-form of ἀνάπηρος and, along with Mounce, prefers it as headword
- in our analysis it should probably be ἀνάπειρος given the forms in the text
ἀνατάσσομαι:
ἀνατάσσω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text, Danker CL has gone with active headword ἀνατάσσω but BDAG and Mounce prefer middle as headword, which is what our analysis uses
ἀνατίθεμαι:
ἀνατίθημι:
tags: ["ημι/εμαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀνατίθημι
ἀνεμίζομαι:
ἀνεμίζω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀνεμίζω
ἀνέχομαι:
ἀνέχω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀνέχω
Ἅννα:
Ἇννα:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
comment:
- any basis for Mounce's accentuation? check if it was a mistake in my original conversion to UTF-8
Ἅννας:
Ἇννας:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
comment:
- any basis for Mounce's accentuation? check if it was a mistake in my original conversion to UTF-8
ἀντέχομαι:
ἀντέχω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀντέχω
ἀντιδιατίθεμαι:
ἀντιδιατίθημι:
tags: ["ημι/εμαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀντιδιατίθημι
ἀντιλαμβάνομαι:
ἀντιλαμβάνω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀντιλαμβάνω
ἀντιτάσσομαι:
ἀντιτάσσω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀντιτάσσω
ἀνώτερον:
ἀνώτερος:
tags: ["ον/ος"]
sources: ["danker-entry", "bdag-headword"]
comment:
- our analysis has both ἀνώτερον and ἀνώτερος as lemmas for the same form ἀνώτερον
- Danker CL claims ἀνώτερον is adverb from neuter comparative
- Danker CL and BDAG have ἀνώτερος as headword
- Mounce only has ἀνώτερον and as adverb
ἀνώτερος:
comment:
- our analysis has both ἀνώτερον and ἀνώτερος as lemmas for the same form ἀνώτερον
- should Heb 10.8 really have lemma ἀνώτερον?
- Danker CL claims ἀνώτερον is adverb from neuter comparative
- Mounce only has ἀνώτερον and as adverb
ἀπάγχομαι:
ἀπάγχω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀπάγχω
ἀπαλλοτριόομαι:
ἀπαλλοτριόω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀπαλλοτριόω
ἄπειμι:
<missing>:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
comment:
- in our analysis, should we distinguish between the two lexemes this represents?
- need to check printed BDAG as likely only missing in my electronic list of headwords because of I./II.
ἄπειρος:
<missing>:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
comment:
- need to check printed BDAG as seems odd to be missing
ἀποκαθίστημι:
ἀποκαθίστημι/ἀποκαθιστάνω:
tags: ["μι/ω"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- our analysis only has ἀποκαθίστημι as lemma
- Danker CL treats ἀποκαθίστημι and ἀποκαθιστάνω equally as lemmas
- not sure we have any basis for choosing between the two options for lemma
ἀποκρίνομαι:
ἀποκρίνω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- our text and analysis only has middle/passive forms
- Danker CL (as it often seems to) favours the active form ἀποκρίνω even against BDAG
ἀποκτείνω:
ἀποκτείνω/ἀποκτέννω:
tags: ["/ in value @@"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- our analysis only has ἀποκτείνω as lemma
- Danker CL treats ἀποκτείνω and ἀποκτέννω equally as lemmas
- not sure if there are some forms in our text better explained with ἀποκτέννω rather than ἀποκτείνω
- not sure we otherwise have any basis for choosing between the two options for lemma
ἀπολούομαι:
ἀπολούω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀπολούω
ἀπομάσσομαι:
ἀπομάσσω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀπομάσσω
ἀπορίπτω:
ἀπο(ρ)ρίπτω:
tags: ["double ρ"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- Danker CL allows for single and double rho in same headword
- BDAG has two separate entries
- our text only has single rho
ἀποτάσσομαι:
ἀποτάσσω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀποτάσσω
ἀποτρέπομαι:
ἀποτρέπω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀποτρέπω
ἀποχωρίζομαι:
ἀποχωρίζω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle/passive form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀποχωρίζω
Ἀππίου:
Ἄππιος:
tags: ["inflected partial"]
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
Ἀππίου φόρον:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
Ἀππίου Φόρον:
tags: ["space in value"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- our analysis splits Ἀππίου Φόρου into two with lemmata Ἀππίου and Φόρον
- Danker CL has Ἀππίου Φόρον as a single entry
- BDAG has Ἀππίου φόρον as a single entry
- Mounce has an entry with the lemma Ἄππιος
- more general question of how to handle what could be viewed as a multi-word entry
ἀπωθέομαι:
ἀπωθέω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀπωθέω
ἆρα:
ὰρα:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
comment:
- this is just a bad accentuation in Mounce (likely as a result of my conversion to UTF-8)
Ἄρειος:
Ἄρειος πάγος:
tags: ["space in value"]
sources: ["danker-entry", "bdag-headword"]
comment:
- our analysis splits Ἄρειον Πάγον and Ἀρείου Πάγου into two with lemmata Ἄρειος and Πάγος
- Danker CL and BDAG have Ἄρειος πάγος as a single entry
- Mounce has an entry with the lemma Ἄρειος
- more general question of how to handle what could be viewed as a multi-word entry
Ἁρμαγεδών:
Ἁρμαγεδ(δ)ών:
tags: ["double δ"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- Danker CL allows for single and double delta in same headword
- BDAG has two separate entries
- our text only has single delta
ἁρμόζομαι:
ἁρμόζω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle form in our text (and analysis) but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἁρμόζω
ἆσσον:
ὰσσον:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
comment:
- this is just a bad accentuation in Mounce (likely as a result of my conversion to UTF-8)
Αὐγοῦστος:
Αὔγουστος:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry"]
comment:
- BDAG and Danker CL favour proparoxytone
- Mounce and our analysis favour properispomenon
- text itself seems to favour properispomenon
αὐξάνω:
αὐξάνω/αὔξω:
tags: ["/ in value @@"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- Danker CL considers αὐξάνω and αὔξω in the same entry
- Mounce gives separate G/K numbers for them but has αὔξω as just 'see αὐξάνω'
- BDAG has both in headword list but I need to check printed to see if one references the other
- our analysis uses both as lemmas
αὔξω:
αὐξάνω/αὔξω:
tags: ["/ in value @@"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- Danker CL considers αὐξάνω and αὔξω in the same entry
- Mounce gives separate G/K numbers for them but has αὔξω as just 'see αὐξάνω'
- BDAG has both in headword list but I need to check printed to see if one references the other
- our analysis uses both as lemmas
αὐτοῦ:
<missing>:
tags: []
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
comment:
- Mounce does not appear to have an entry for the adverb αὐτοῦ. It may just treat it as αὐτός
ἀφίσταμαι:
ἀφίστημι:
tags: ["ημι/αμαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle lemma in our analysis but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀφίστημι
- the active form does seem to appear in our text
ἀχρειόομαι:
ἀχρειόω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle lemma in our analysis but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword ἀχρειόω
- text only has passive form (Danker CL claims in active sense but I dispute that)
ἄχρις:
ἄχρι:
tags: ["movable ς"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "mounce-headword"]
ἄχρι, ἄχρις:
tags: ["movable ς", ", in value @@"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- BDAG and Mounce have ἄχρι (possibly BDAG mentions ἄχρις in entry)
- Danker CL has ἄχρι, ἄχρις as single entry
- our analysis treats ἄχρι and ἄχρις as distinct (they should probably be merged)
ἄψινθος:
ἀψίνθιον/ἄψινθος:
tags: ["/ in value @@"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
ἀψίνθιον:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
comment:
- because the text treats ἄψινθος and Ἄψινθος distinctly, so does our lemmatization
- Danker CL combines ἀψίνθιον and ἄψινθος in headword (and includes Ἄψινθος in the entry)
- BDAG just has ἀψίνθιον as headword (need to check printed copy for ἄψινθος/Ἄψινθος)
- Mounce has separate entries for ἀψίνθιον ἄψινθος but not for Ἄψινθος
Ἄψινθος:
ἀψίνθιον/ἄψινθος:
tags: ["/ in value @@", "case"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
ἄψινθος:
tags: ["case"]
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
<missing>:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
comment:
- because the text treats ἄψινθος and Ἄψινθος distinctly, so does our lemmatization
- Danker CL combines ἀψίνθιον and ἄψινθος in headword (and includes Ἄψινθος in the entry)
- BDAG just has ἀψίνθιον as headword (need to check printed copy for ἄψινθος/Ἄψινθος)
- Mounce has separate entries for ἀψίνθιον ἄψινθος but not for Ἄψινθος
βάϊον:
βαΐον:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
βαΐον/βάϊον:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- Danker CL has combined entry βαΐον/βάϊον for both accentuations
- our analysis has βάϊον but text suggests βαΐον may be better
- BDAG prefers βαΐον
- Mounce prefers βάϊον
Βαριησοῦς:
Βαριησοῦ:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
comment:
- what is the basis for BDAG's Βαριησοῦ vs Βαριησοῦς? (need to check printed copy)
Βαριωνᾶ:
Βαριωνᾶ/Βαριωνᾶς:
tags: ["/ in value @@"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- Danker CL has combined Βαριωνᾶ/Βαριωνᾶς headword allowing both indeclinable and declinable forms
- only indeclinable form appears in our text
βασίλειον:
βασίλειος:
tags: ["ον/ος"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- both βασίλειον and βασίλειος appear in our analysis as lemmata
- BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce only have βασίλειος
- should we just change Lk 7.25 to βασίλειος?
βάτος:
<missing>:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
comment:
- this is always and interesting case because there are two distinct lexemes, one of which has two genders
- need to check printed BDAG as likely only missing in my electronic list of headwords because of I./II.
- as well as checking BDAG, we need to decide how best to model these lexemes
βέλτιον:
βελτίων:
tags: ["comp/adv"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- Danker CL identifies it as a neuter comparative functioning as adverb
- Robinson analysis has ADV-C but CCAT analysis has A<ASNC>
- BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer βελτίων
- key question is: is this simply *functioning* as an adverb or do we say it *is* an adverb, derived from an adjective (latter is my leaning)
Βενιαμίν:
Βενιαμ(ε)ίν:
tags: ["ει/ι"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- Danker CL merges both spellings into one entry
- BDAG has two separate entries, Βενιαμίν and Βενιαμείν
- Mounce only gives Βενιαμίν but there's a gap in the G/K which could mean Βενιαμείν is 1020
Βηθσαϊδά:
Βηθσαϊδά(ν):
tags: ["movable ν"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- BDAG and Mounce have separate entries for Βηθσαϊδά and Βηθσαϊδάν
- Danker CL combines Βηθσαϊδά and Βηθσαϊδάν as a single entry
Βηθσαϊδάν:
Βηθσαϊδά(ν):
tags: ["movable ν"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- BDAG and Mounce have separate entries for Βηθσαϊδά and Βηθσαϊδάν
- Danker CL combines Βηθσαϊδά and Βηθσαϊδάν as a single entry
βλαστάνω:
βλαστάνω/βλαστάω:
tags: ["/ in value @@"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- BDAG only has βλαστάνω
- Mounce only has βλαστάνω but there's a gap in the G/K which means βλαστάω could be 1057
- Danker CL has combined entry βλαστάνω/βλαστάω
βουλεύομαι:
βουλεύω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle lemma in our analysis but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword βουλεύω
βραχύ:
βραχύς:
tags: ["movable ς"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all just have βραχύς as headword
- our analysis treats βραχύ and βραχύς as distinct depending on adverb vs adjective
- decision on this relates to whether "adjective functioning as adverb" warrants a separate lexeme
Γαββαθα:
Γαββαθᾶ:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "mounce-headword"]
Γαββαθά:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- BDAG and Mounce have Γαββαθᾶ
- Danker CL has Γαββαθά (what is basis for Danker CL differing from BDAG?)
- SBLGNT doesn't accent foreign proper names so analysis follows that
γαζοφυλάκιον:
γαζοφυλακεῖον/γαζαφυλάκιον:
tags: ["ει/ι"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- only Danker CL supports an ει/ι spelling variant in the headword itself
Γάϊος:
Γάϊος/Γαῖος:
tags: ["diaeresis"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- only Danker supports the version without the diaeresis in the headword itself
γενεαλογέομαι:
γενεαλογέω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle lemma in our analysis but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all have active headword γενεαλογέω
δανείζω:
δανίζω:
tags: []
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
δαν(ε)ίζω:
tags: ["ει/ι"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- BDAG has two separate entries δανίζω and δανείζω
- Danker CL has a single entry δαν(ε)ίζω
- Mounce only has δανίζω but there's a G/K gap which *may* fit δανείζω at 1246
- the forms in our text suggest δανίζω as a preferred lemma for our analysis
δάνειον:
δάν(ε)ιον:
tags: ["ει/ι"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- BDAG has two separate entries δάνιον and δάνειον
- Danker CL has a single entry δάν(ε)ιον
- Mounce only has δάνειον
- the form in our text suggests staying with δάνειον
δανιστής:
δαν(ε)ιστής:
tags: ["ει/ι"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- BDAG has two separate entries δανιστής and δανειστής
- Danker CL has a single entry δαν(ε)ιστής
- Mounce only has δανιστής
- the form in our text suggests staying with δανιστής
δείκνυμι:
δείκνυμι/δεικνύω:
tags: ["μι/ω"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- BDAG only has δείκνυμι
- Danker CL has a single entry δείκνυμι/δεικνύω
- Mounce only has δείκνυμι but there's a G/K gap 1260 which could fit δεικνύω
- not clear how we would pick between these two lemmata although some analysis of forms in text might be worthwhile
δεκαοκτώ:
<missing>:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
comment:
- BDAG doesn't have a separate entry for δεκαοκτώ
δεκαπέντε:
<missing>:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
comment:
- BDAG doesn't have a separate entry for δεκαπέντε
δεκάτη:
δέκατος:
tags: ["η/ος"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer δέκατος
- our analysis should probably just use δέκατος for lemma
δεσμόν:
δεσμός:
tags: ["ον/ος"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- our analysis has both δεσμόν (only in plural) and δεσμός
- Danker CL only has δεσμός but mentions use of neuter plural
- BDAG and Mounce only have δεσμός
- how do we model this?
Διάβολος:
διάβολος:
tags: ["case"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all only have lowercase
- following from our rule that lemmatization doesn't change case, we're left with need for separate Διάβολος entry
διαπρίομαι:
διαπρίω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only in middle form in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active διαπρίω as headword
διαρρήγνυμι:
δια(ρ)ρήγνυμι/διαρήσσω:
tags: ["μι/ω"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- BDAG has διαρήγνυμι and διαρρήγνυμι
- Mounce has διαρήσσω and διαρρήγνυμι
- Danker CL has διαρήγνυμι, διαρρήγνυμι and διαρήσσω all in one headword
- our analysis only has διαρρήγνυμι and the forms in the text suggest no reason to change that
διαστέλλομαι:
διαστέλλω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only in middle form in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active διαστέλλω as headword
διατίθεμαι:
διατίθημι:
tags: ["ημι/εμαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only in middle form in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active διατίθημι as headword
διαχειρίζομαι:
διαχειρίζω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only in middle form in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active διαχειρίζω as headword
διαχωρίζομαι:
διαχωριζω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι", "accentuation"]
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
διαχωρίζω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only in middle form in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active διαχωρίζω as headword
- BDAG headword list has unaccented διαχωριζω but that's clearly just a glitch and I assume printed has διαχωρίζω
δογματίζομαι:
δογματίζω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only in middle form in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active δογματίζω as headword
δωδεκάφυλον:
δωδεκάφυλος:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
comment:
- I'm not sure why BDAG has δωδεκάφυλος
ἐγγύτερον:
ἐγγύς:
tags: ["-τερον"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- ἐγγύτερον is the comparative of ἐγγύς and neither BDAG nor Danker CL treat it as a separate lexeme
- is G/K 1585 == ἐγγύτερον?
εἶδος:
εὶδος:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
comment:
- this is just a bad accentuation in Mounce (likely as a result of my conversion to UTF-8)
εἰδωλόθυτον:
εἰδωλόθυτος:
tags: ["ον/ος"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- treated in our analysis as an adjective (so choice of neuter lemma is odd)
- Danker CL claims only used as a noun
- analysis should change either part-of-speech or lemma as currently inconsistent choice
εἴκοσι(ν):
εἴκοσι:
tags: ["movable ν"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only ever as εἴκοσι in our text
- is the movable-ν a mistake? Danker CL doesn't offer it as a possibility
εἴπερ:
εἰ w. περ:
tags: ["space in value"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- Danker CL prefers εἴπερ as two separate words, but clearly it isn't in our text
εἰσκαλέομαι:
εἰσκαλέω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- only the middle occurs in our analysis
- Danker CL (as it often seems to) favours the active form εἰσκαλέω even against BDAG
εἰσπορεύομαι:
εἰσπορεύω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- only the middle occurs in our analysis
- Danker CL (as it often seems to) favours the active form εἰσπορεύω even against BDAG
εἶτα:
εὶτα:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
comment:
- this is just a bad accentuation in Mounce (likely as a result of my conversion to UTF-8)
ἑκατόνταρχος:
ἑκατοντάρχης:
tags: ["ης/ος"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- our analysis has both ἑκατόνταρχος and ἑκατοντάρχης
- BDAG and Mounce have both as separate entries
- Danker CL combined them with headword ἑκατοντάρχης / ἑκατόνταρχος (somehow lost in lexeme.yaml)
- we should update lexeme.yaml to reflect Danker's headword combination
ἔκγονον:
ἔκγονος:
tags: ["ον/ος"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- treated in our analysis as an adjective (so choice of neuter lemma is odd)
- BDAG only has ἔκγονος
- Mounce only has ἔκγονος but there is a gap in G/K which could be ἔκγονον (1680)
- Danker CL suggests 1Ti 5.4 is a noun
- analysis should change either part-of-speech or lemma as currently inconsistent choice
ἐκδαπανάομαι:
ἐκδαπανάω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only in passive form (middle lemma) in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active δογματίζω as headword
ἐκθαμβέομαι:
ἐκθαμβέω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only passive in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active ἐκθαμβέω as headword
ἐκκαίομαι:
ἐκκαίω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only passive in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active ἐκκαίω as headword
ἐκκρέμαμαι:
ἐκκρεμάννυμι:
tags: ["αννυμι/αμαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active ἐκκρεμάννυμι as headword
ἐκλανθάνω:
ἐκλανθάνομαι:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- our text has the active lemma (although form in text is middle)
- BDAG and Mounce prefer middle lemma ἐκλανθάνομαι but Danker CL prefers the active
ἐκλέγομαι:
ἐκλέγω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- only the middle occurs in our analysis
- Danker CL (as it often seems to) favours the active form ἐκλέγω even against BDAG
ἐκλύομαι:
ἐκλύω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle/passive in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active ἐκλύω as headword
ἐκπλήσσομαι:
ἐκπλήσσω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle/passive in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active ἐκπλήσσω as headword
ἐκστρέφομαι:
ἐκστρέφω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active ἐκστρέφω as headword
ἐκτενέστερον:
ἐκτενῶς:
tags: ["-τερον"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- our analysis has both ἐκτενέστερον (adjective in Lk) and ἐκτενῶς (adverb in Ac and 1Pe)
- Danker CL just has ἐκτενῶς entry (with ἐκτενέστερον as comparative adverb within it)
- lexemes.yaml must have bad danker-entry
- BDAG only has ἐκτενῶς
- Mounce only has ἐκτενῶς
- should our analysis of ἐκτενέστερον be changed to adverb?
ἐκτρέπομαι:
ἐκτρέπω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- only middle in our text but BDAG, Danker CL and Mounce all prefer active ἐκστρέφω as headword
ἐκχέω:
ἐκχέω/ἐκχύν(ν)ω:
tags: ["/ in value @@"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- BDAG has ἐκχέω and ἐκχύνω ἐκχύννω as separate headwords
- Danker combines them
- Mounce only has ἐκχέω but there is a G/K gap at 1773
- our analysis only uses ἐκχέω although there are forms obviously based on ἐκχύν(ν)ω
Ἐλαιῶν:
ἐλαία:
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- ἐλαία = olive tree; hence τὸ ὄρος τῶν ἐλαιῶν = mount of olives
- ἐλαιών (note accent) is an olive grove
- BDAG, Mounce and Danker CL all have ἐλαιών and ἐλαία as separate entries
- Danker CL includes the sense τὸ ὄρος τῶν ἐλαιῶν under ἐλαία, not ἐλαιών
- I'll have to check BDAG to see where it puts the τὸ ὄρος τῶν ἐλαιῶν case
- our normalized text has both ἐλαιῶν and Ἐλαιῶν which are lemmatized ἐλαία and Ἐλαιῶν respectively
- we may need to review each on a case-by-case basis
- this is related to how we handle oblique cases in multi-word proper nouns elsewhere
ἐλάσσων:
ἐλάσσων/ἔλασσον:
tags: ["/ in value @@"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- our analysis only has ἐλάσσων as lemma
- Danker CL treats ἐλάσσων and ἔλασσον equally as lemmas
- some actual forms seems to suggest Attic forms ἔλαττων/ἔλαττον as well
- should we have different lemmas where appropriate?
- not sure we otherwise have any basis for choosing between the two options for lemma
Ἐλιακίμ:
Ἐλιακίμ/Ἐλιακείμ:
tags: ["/ in value @@"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- our analysis only has Ἐλιακίμ but Danker CL allows for both Ἐλιακίμ and Ἐλιακείμ in same entry
ἑλκόομαι:
ἑλκόω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
comment:
- our text and analysis only has middle/passive form
- Danker CL (as it often seems to) favours the active form ἑλκόω even against BDAG
ἕλκω:
ἑλκύω/ἕλκω:
tags: ["/ in value @@"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
ἑλκύω:
tags: ["ύω/ω"]
sources: ["mounce-headword"]
comment:
- Danker CL treats ἑλκύω and ἕλκω under the same heading
- out text has some forms (in future and aorist) that seem to come
from ἑλκύω and some forms (in imperfect and present) that seem
to come from ἕλκω
- our analysis only uses ἕλκω as lemma
- BDAG has ἕλκω and ἑλκύω as separate headwords
- Mounce only has ἑλκύω
- not sure how we would decide which lemma to use
ἐλλογέω:
ἐλλογέω/ἐλλογάω:
tags: ["/ in value @@"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- Mounce has separate entries for ἐλλογέω and ἐλλογάω
- BDAG only has ἐλλογέω
- Danker CL combines ἐλλογέω and ἐλλογάω in the same entry
- in one form (in Romans) in our text, ἐλλογέω is suggested but the imperative in Philemon suggests a lemma of ἐλλογάω
ἐλωΐ:
ελωι:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
comment:
- Danker CL does not use accents or breathing for this indeclinable Aramaic words
- BDAG and Mounce, however, do accent it
- our text accents it
Ἑμμώρ:
Ἐμμώρ:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
ἐμπίμπλημι:
ἐμπί(μ)πλημι/ἐμπι(μ)πλάω:
tags: ["/ in value @@"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
ἐμπίμπρημι:
ἐμπί(μ)πρημι:
tags: ["(μ)π"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
ἐμπλέκομαι:
ἐμπλέκω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
ἐνάλιον:
ἐνάλιος:
tags: ["ον/ος"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
ἐνδέχεται:
ἐνδέχομαι:
tags: ["ομαι/εται"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
ἐνδοξάζομαι:
ἐνδοξάζω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
ἕνεκεν:
<missing>:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword"]
ἕνεκα:
tags: ["εν/α"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
ἐνέος:
ἐνεός:
tags: ["accentuation"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
ἔννυχα:
<missing>:
tags: []
sources: ["bdag-headword", "mounce-headword"]
ἔννυχος:
tags: ["ος/α"]
sources: ["danker-entry"]
ἐντέλλομαι:
ἐντέλλω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
ἐντρέφομαι:
ἐντρέφω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
ἐξαιτέομαι:
ἐξαιτέω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]
sources: ["bdag-headword", "danker-entry", "mounce-headword"]
ἐξαπορέομαι:
ἐξαπορέω:
tags: ["ω/ομαι"]