forked from saylordotorg/text_principles-of-sociological-inquiry-qualitative-and-quantitative-methods
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy paths10-03-sampling-in-quantitative-resea.html
742 lines (723 loc) · 43 KB
/
s10-03-sampling-in-quantitative-resea.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<link href="shared/bookhub.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<title>Sampling in Quantitative Research</title>
</head>
<body>
<div id=navbar-top class="navbar">
<div class="navbar-part left">
<a href="s10-02-sampling-in-qualitative-resear.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-left.png"></a> <a href="s10-02-sampling-in-qualitative-resear.html">Previous Section</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part middle">
<a href="index.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-up.png"></a> <a href="index.html">Table of Contents</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part right">
<a href="s10-04-a-word-of-caution-questions-to.html">Next Section</a> <a href="s10-04-a-word-of-caution-questions-to.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-right.png"></a>
</div>
</div>
<div id="book-content">
<div class="section" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03" condition="start-of-chunk" version="5.0" lang="en">
<h2 class="title editable block">
<span class="title-prefix">7.3</span> Sampling in Quantitative Research</h2>
<div class="learning_objectives editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_n01">
<h3 class="title">Learning Objectives</h3>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_l01">
<li>Describe how probability sampling differs from nonprobability sampling.</li>
<li>Define generalizability, and describe how it is achieved in probability samples.</li>
<li>Identify the various types of probability samples, and provide a brief description of each.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_p01">Quantitative researchers are often interested in being able to make generalizations about groups larger than their study samples. While there are certainly instances when quantitative researchers rely on nonprobability samples (e.g., when doing exploratory or evaluation research), quantitative researchers tend to rely on probability sampling techniques. The goals and techniques associated with probability samples differ from those of nonprobability samples. We’ll explore those unique goals and techniques in this section.</p>
<div class="section" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">Probability Sampling</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s01_p01">Unlike nonprobability sampling, <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">probability sampling</a><span class="glossdef">Sampling techniques for which a person’s likelihood of being selected for membership in the sample is known.</span></span> refers to sampling techniques for which a person’s (or event’s) likelihood of being selected for membership in the sample is known. You might ask yourself why we should care about a study element’s likelihood of being selected for membership in a researcher’s sample. The reason is that, in most cases, researchers who use probability sampling techniques are aiming to identify a <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">representative sample</a><span class="glossdef">A sample that resembles the population from which it was drawn in all the ways that are important for the research being conducted.</span></span> from which to collect data. A representative sample is one that resembles the population from which it was drawn in all the ways that are important for the research being conducted. If, for example, you wish to be able to say something about differences between men and women at the end of your study, you better make sure that your sample doesn’t contain only women. That’s a bit of an oversimplification, but the point with representativeness is that if your population varies in some way that is important to your study, your sample should contain the same sorts of variation.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s01_p02">Obtaining a representative sample is important in probability sampling because a key goal of studies that rely on probability samples is <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">generalizability</a><span class="glossdef">The idea that a study’s results will tell us something about a group larger than the sample from which the findings were generated.</span></span>. In fact, generalizability is perhaps the key feature that distinguishes probability samples from nonprobability samples. Generalizability refers to the idea that a study’s results will tell us something about a group larger than the sample from which the findings were generated. In order to achieve generalizability, a core principle of probability sampling is that all elements in the researcher’s target population have an equal chance of being selected for inclusion in the study. In research, this is the principle of <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">random selection</a><span class="glossdef">The principle that all elements in a researcher’s target population have an equal chance of being selected for inclusion in the study.</span></span>. Random selection is a mathematical process that we won’t go into too much depth about here, but if you have taken or plan to take a statistics course, you’ll learn more about it there. The important thing to remember about random selection here is that, as previously noted, it is a core principal of probability sampling. If a researcher uses random selection techniques to draw a sample, he or she will be able to estimate how closely the sample represents the larger population from which it was drawn by estimating the sampling error. <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">Sampling error</a><span class="glossdef">The extent to which a sample represents its population on a particular parameter.</span></span> is a statistical calculation of the difference between results from a sample and the actual <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">parameters</a><span class="glossdef">The actual characteristics of a population on any given variable; determined by measuring all elements in a population (as opposed to measuring elements from a sample).</span></span> of a population.</p>
</div>
<div class="section" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02">
<h2 class="title editable block">Types of Probability Samples</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_p01">There are a variety of probability samples that researchers may use. These include simple random samples, systematic samples, stratified samples, and cluster samples.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_p02"><span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">Simple random samples</a><span class="glossdef">The most basic type of probability sample; a researcher begins with a list of every member of his or her population of interest, numbers each element sequentially, and then randomly selects the elements from which he or she will collect data.</span></span> are the most basic type of probability sample, but their use is not particularly common. Part of the reason for this may be the work involved in generating a simple random sample. To draw a simple random sample, a researcher starts with a list of every single member, or element, of his or her population of interest. This list is sometimes referred to as a <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">sampling frame</a><span class="glossdef">A list of all elements in a population.</span></span>. Once that list has been created, the researcher numbers each element sequentially and then randomly selects the elements from which he or she will collect data. To randomly select elements, researchers use a table of numbers that have been generated randomly. There are several possible sources for obtaining a random number table. Some statistics and research methods textbooks offer such tables as appendices to the text. Perhaps a more accessible source is one of the many free random number generators available on the Internet. A good online source is the website Stat Trek, which contains a random number generator that you can use to create a random number table of whatever size you might need (<a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://stattrek.com/Tables/Random.aspx">http://stattrek.com/Tables/Random.aspx</a>). Randomizer.org also offers a useful random number generator (<a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://randomizer.org">http://randomizer.org</a>).</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_p03">As you might have guessed, drawing a simple random sample can be quite tedious. <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">Systematic sampling</a><span class="glossdef">A researcher divides a study population into relevant subgroups then draws a sample from each subgroup.</span></span> techniques are somewhat less tedious but offer the benefits of a random sample. As with simple random samples, you must be able to produce a list of every one of your population elements. Once you’ve done that, to draw a systematic sample you’d simply select every <em class="emphasis">k</em>th element on your list. But what is <em class="emphasis">k</em>, and where on the list of population elements does one begin the selection process? <em class="emphasis">k</em> is your <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">selection interval</a><span class="glossdef">The distance between elements selected for inclusion in a study.</span></span> or the distance between the elements you select for inclusion in your study. To begin the selection process, you’ll need to figure out how many elements you wish to include in your sample. Let’s say you want to interview 25 fraternity members on your campus, and there are 100 men on campus who are members of fraternities. In this case, your selection interval, or <em class="emphasis">k</em>, is 4. To arrive at 4, simply divide the total number of population elements by your desired sample size. This process is represented in <a class="xref" href="#blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_f02">Figure 7.5 "Formula for Determining Selection Interval for Systematic Sample"</a>.</p>
<div class="figure large editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_f02">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Figure 7.5</span> Formula for Determining Selection Interval for Systematic Sample</p>
<img src="section_10/ffba99f3272c4ab03383a3c484d2e046.jpg">
</div>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_p04">To determine where on your list of population elements to begin selecting the names of the 25 men you will interview, select a random number between 1 and <em class="emphasis">k</em>, and begin there. If we randomly select 3 as our starting point, we’d begin by selecting the third fraternity member on the list and then select every fourth member from there. This might be easier to understand if you can see it visually. <a class="xref" href="#blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_t01">Table 7.2 "Systematic Sample of 25 Fraternity Members"</a> lists the names of our hypothetical 100 fraternity members on campus. You’ll see that the third name on the list has been selected for inclusion in our hypothetical study, as has every fourth name after that. A total of 25 names have been selected.</p>
<div class="table block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_t01" frame="all">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Table 7.2</span> Systematic Sample of 25 Fraternity Members</p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Number</th>
<th>Name</th>
<th>Include in study?</th>
<th></th>
<th>Number</th>
<th>Name</th>
<th>Include in study?</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Jacob</td>
<td></td>
<td rowspan="50"></td>
<td>51</td>
<td>Blake</td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Ethan</td>
<td></td>
<td>52</td>
<td>Oliver</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Michael</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>53</td>
<td>Cole</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Jayden</td>
<td></td>
<td>54</td>
<td>Carlos</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>William</td>
<td></td>
<td>55</td>
<td>Jaden</td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Alexander</td>
<td></td>
<td>56</td>
<td>Jesus</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Noah</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>57</td>
<td>Alex</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Daniel</td>
<td></td>
<td>58</td>
<td>Aidan</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Aiden</td>
<td></td>
<td>59</td>
<td>Eric</td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Anthony</td>
<td></td>
<td>60</td>
<td>Hayden</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>11</td>
<td>Joshua</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>61</td>
<td>Brian</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>12</td>
<td>Mason</td>
<td></td>
<td>62</td>
<td>Max</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>13</td>
<td>Christopher</td>
<td></td>
<td>63</td>
<td>Jaxon</td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>14</td>
<td>Andrew</td>
<td></td>
<td>64</td>
<td>Brian</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div class="informaltable editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_t11" frame="all">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Number</th>
<th>Name</th>
<th>Include in study?</th>
<th></th>
<th>Number</th>
<th>Name</th>
<th>Include in study?</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>15</td>
<td>David</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>65</td>
<td>Matthew</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>16</td>
<td>Logan</td>
<td></td>
<td>66</td>
<td>Elijah</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>17</td>
<td>James</td>
<td></td>
<td>67</td>
<td>Joseph</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>18</td>
<td>Gabriel</td>
<td></td>
<td>68</td>
<td>Benjamin</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>19</td>
<td>Ryan</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>69</td>
<td>Samuel</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>20</td>
<td>Jackson</td>
<td></td>
<td>70</td>
<td>John</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>21</td>
<td>Nathan</td>
<td></td>
<td>71</td>
<td>Jonathan</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>22</td>
<td>Christian</td>
<td></td>
<td>72</td>
<td>Liam</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>23</td>
<td>Dylan</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>73</td>
<td>Landon</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>24</td>
<td>Caleb</td>
<td></td>
<td>74</td>
<td>Tyler</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>25</td>
<td>Lucas</td>
<td></td>
<td>75</td>
<td>Evan</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>26</td>
<td>Gavin</td>
<td></td>
<td>76</td>
<td>Nicholas</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>27</td>
<td>Isaac</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>77</td>
<td>Braden</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>28</td>
<td>Luke</td>
<td></td>
<td>78</td>
<td>Angel</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>29</td>
<td>Brandon</td>
<td></td>
<td>79</td>
<td>Jack</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>30</td>
<td>Isaiah</td>
<td></td>
<td>80</td>
<td>Jordan</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>31</td>
<td>Owen</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>81</td>
<td>Carter</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>32</td>
<td>Conner</td>
<td></td>
<td>82</td>
<td>Justin</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>33</td>
<td>Jose</td>
<td></td>
<td>83</td>
<td>Jeremiah</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>34</td>
<td>Julian</td>
<td></td>
<td>84</td>
<td>Robert</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>35</td>
<td>Aaron</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>85</td>
<td>Adrian</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>36</td>
<td>Wyatt</td>
<td></td>
<td>86</td>
<td>Kevin</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>37</td>
<td>Hunter</td>
<td></td>
<td>87</td>
<td>Cameron</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>38</td>
<td>Zachary</td>
<td></td>
<td>88</td>
<td>Thomas</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>39</td>
<td>Charles</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>89</td>
<td>Austin</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>40</td>
<td>Eli</td>
<td></td>
<td>90</td>
<td>Chase</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>41</td>
<td>Henry</td>
<td></td>
<td>91</td>
<td>Sebastian</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>42</td>
<td>Jason</td>
<td></td>
<td>92</td>
<td>Levi</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>43</td>
<td>Xavier</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>93</td>
<td>Ian</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>44</td>
<td>Colton</td>
<td></td>
<td>94</td>
<td>Dominic</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>45</td>
<td>Juan</td>
<td></td>
<td>95</td>
<td>Cooper</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>46</td>
<td>Josiah</td>
<td></td>
<td>96</td>
<td>Luis</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>47</td>
<td>Ayden</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>97</td>
<td>Carson</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>48</td>
<td>Adam</td>
<td></td>
<td>98</td>
<td>Nathaniel</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>49</td>
<td>Brody</td>
<td></td>
<td>99</td>
<td>Tristan</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>50</td>
<td>Diego</td>
<td></td>
<td>100</td>
<td>Parker</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<th colspan="7">
<em class="emphasis">Note:</em> In case you’re wondering how I came up with 100 unique names for this table, I’ll let you in on a little secret: lists of popular baby names can be great resources for researchers. I used the list of top 100 names for boys based on Social Security Administration statistics for this table. I often use baby name lists to come up with pseudonyms for field research subjects and interview participants. See Family Education. (n.d.). Name lab. Retrieved from <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://baby-names.familyeducation.com/popular-names/boys">http://baby-names.familyeducation.com/popular-names/boys</a>.</th>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
</div>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_p05">There is one clear instance in which systematic sampling should not be employed. If your sampling frame has any pattern to it, you could inadvertently introduce bias into your sample by using a systemic sampling strategy. This is sometimes referred to as the problem of <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">periodicity</a><span class="glossdef">The tendency for a pattern to occur at regular intervals.</span></span>. Periodicity refers to the tendency for a pattern to occur at regular intervals. Let’s say, for example, that you wanted to observe how people use the outdoor public spaces on your campus. Perhaps you need to have your observations completed within 28 days and you wish to conduct four observations on randomly chosen days. <a class="xref" href="#blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_t02">Table 7.3 "Systematic Sample of Observation Days"</a> shows a list of the population elements for this example. To determine which days we’ll conduct our observations, we’ll need to determine our selection interval. As you’ll recall from the preceding paragraphs, to do so we must divide our population size, in this case 28 days, by our desired sample size, in this case 4 days. This formula leads us to a selection interval of 7. If we randomly select 2 as our starting point and select every seventh day after that, we’ll wind up with a total of 4 days on which to conduct our observations. You’ll see how that works out in the following table.</p>
<div class="table block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_t02" frame="all">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Table 7.3</span> Systematic Sample of Observation Days</p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Number</th>
<th>Day</th>
<th>Include in study?</th>
<th></th>
<th>Number</th>
<th>Day</th>
<th>Include in study?</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Monday</td>
<td></td>
<td rowspan="14"></td>
<td>15</td>
<td>Monday</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Tuesday</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>16</td>
<td>Tuesday</td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Wednesday</td>
<td></td>
<td>17</td>
<td>Wednesday</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Thursday</td>
<td></td>
<td>18</td>
<td>Thursday</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Friday</td>
<td></td>
<td>19</td>
<td>Friday</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Saturday</td>
<td></td>
<td>20</td>
<td>Saturday</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Sunday</td>
<td></td>
<td>21</td>
<td>Sunday</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Monday</td>
<td></td>
<td>22</td>
<td>Monday</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Tuesday</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>23</td>
<td>Tuesday</td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Wednesday</td>
<td></td>
<td>24</td>
<td>Wednesday</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>11</td>
<td>Thursday</td>
<td></td>
<td>25</td>
<td>Thursday</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>12</td>
<td>Friday</td>
<td></td>
<td>26</td>
<td>Friday</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>13</td>
<td>Saturday</td>
<td></td>
<td>27</td>
<td>Saturday</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>14</td>
<td>Sunday</td>
<td></td>
<td>28</td>
<td>Sunday</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_p06">Do you notice any problems with our selection of observation days? Apparently we’ll only be observing on Tuesdays. As you have probably figured out, that isn’t such a good plan if we really wish to understand how public spaces on campus are used. My guess is that weekend use probably differs from weekday use, and that use may even vary during the week, just as class schedules do. In cases such as this, where the sampling frame is cyclical, it would be better to use a <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">stratified sampling technique</a><span class="glossdef">A researcher divides the study population into relevant subgroups then draws a sample from within each subgroup.</span></span>. In stratified sampling, a researcher will divide the study population into relevant subgroups and <em class="emphasis">then</em> draw a sample from each subgroup. In this example, we might wish to first divide our sampling frame into two lists: weekend days and weekdays. Once we have our two lists, we can then apply either simple random or systematic sampling techniques to each subgroup.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_p07">Stratified sampling is a good technique to use when, as in our example, a subgroup of interest makes up a relatively small proportion of the overall sample. In our example of a study of use of public space on campus, we want to be sure to include weekdays and weekends in our sample, but because weekends make up less than a third of an entire week, there’s a chance that a simple random or systematic strategy would not yield sufficient weekend observation days. As you might imagine, stratified sampling is even more useful in cases where a subgroup makes up an even smaller proportion of the study population, say, for example, if we want to be sure to include both men’s and women’s perspectives in a study, but men make up only a small percentage of the population. There’s a chance simple random or systematic sampling strategy might not yield any male participants, but by using stratified sampling, we could ensure that our sample contained the proportion of men that is reflective of the larger population.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_p08">Up to this point in our discussion of probability samples, we’ve assumed that researchers will be able to access a list of population elements in order to create a sampling frame. This, as you might imagine, is not always the case. Let’s say, for example, that you wish to conduct a study of hairstyle preferences across the United States. Just imagine trying to create a list of every single person with (and without) hair in the country. Basically, we’re talking about a list of every person in the country. Even if you could find a way to generate such a list, attempting to do so might not be the most practical use of your time or resources. When this is the case, researchers turn to cluster sampling. <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">Cluster sampling</a><span class="glossdef">A researcher begins by sampling groups of population elements and then selects elements from within those groups.</span></span> occurs when a researcher begins by sampling groups (or clusters) of population elements and then selects elements from within those groups.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_p09">Let’s take a look at a couple more examples. Perhaps you are interested in the workplace experiences of public librarians. Chances are good that obtaining a list of all librarians that work for public libraries would be rather difficult. But I’ll bet you could come up with a list of all public libraries without too much hassle. Thus you could draw a random sample of libraries (your cluster) and then draw another random sample of elements (in this case, librarians) from within the libraries you initially selected. Cluster sampling works in stages. In this example, we sampled in two stages. As you might have guessed, sampling in multiple stages does introduce the possibility of greater error (each stage is subject to its own sampling error), but it is nevertheless a highly efficient method.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_p10">Jessica Holt and Wayne Gillespie (2008)<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn07_008">Holt, J. L., & Gillespie, W. (2008). Intergenerational transmission of violence, threatened egoism, and reciprocity: A test of multiple pychosocial factors affecting intimate partner violence. <em class="emphasis">American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33</em>, 252–266.</span> used cluster sampling in their study of students’ experiences with violence in intimate relationships. Specifically, the researchers randomly selected 14 classes on their campus and then drew a random subsample of students from those classes. But you probably know from your experience with college classes that not all classes are the same size. So if Holt and Gillespie had simply randomly selected 14 classes and then selected the same number of students from each class to complete their survey, then students in the smaller of those classes would have had a greater chance of being selected for the study than students in the larger classes. Keep in mind with random sampling the goal is to make sure that each element has the same chance of being selected. When clusters are of different sizes, as in the example of sampling college classes, researchers often use a method called <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">probability proportionate to size</a><span class="glossdef">A cluster sampling technique in which each cluster is given a chance of selection based on its size.</span></span> (PPS). This means that they take into account that their clusters are of different sizes. They do this by giving clusters different chances of being selected based on their size so that each element within those clusters winds up having an equal chance of being selected.</p>
<div class="table block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_t03" frame="all">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Table 7.4</span> Types of Probability Samples</p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Sample type</th>
<th>Description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Simple random</td>
<td>Researcher randomly selects elements from sampling frame.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Systematic</td>
<td>Researcher selects every <em class="emphasis">k</em>th element from sampling frame.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stratified</td>
<td>Researcher creates subgroups then randomly selects elements from each subgroup.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cluster</td>
<td>Researcher randomly selects clusters then randomly selects elements from selected clusters.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div class="key_takeaways editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_n01">
<h3 class="title">Key Takeaways</h3>
<ul class="itemizedlist" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_l01">
<li>In probability sampling, the aim is to identify a sample that resembles the population from which it was drawn.</li>
<li>There are several types of probability samples including simple random samples, systematic samples, stratified samples, and cluster samples.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="exercises editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_n02">
<h3 class="title">Exercises</h3>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="blackstone_1.0-ch07_s03_s02_l02">
<li>Imagine that you are about to conduct a study of people’s use of public parks. Explain how you could employ each of the probability sampling techniques described earlier to recruit a sample for your study.</li>
<li>Of the four probability sample types described, which seems strongest to you? Which seems weakest? Explain.</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id=navbar-bottom class="navbar">
<div class="navbar-part left">
<a href="s10-02-sampling-in-qualitative-resear.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-left.png"></a> <a href="s10-02-sampling-in-qualitative-resear.html">Previous Section</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part middle">
<a href="index.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-up.png"></a> <a href="index.html">Table of Contents</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part right">
<a href="s10-04-a-word-of-caution-questions-to.html">Next Section</a> <a href="s10-04-a-word-of-caution-questions-to.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-right.png"></a>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="shared/book.js"></script>
</body>
</html>