You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Anyone who has spent time doing releases has figured out that the process is time consuming, and one of the things that makes this more time consuming is having to find someone to review two PRs that are automatically generated and contain exactly what we expect from our scripts.
With this in mind, I really would like to ask whether we could have an agreement on the person who's handling the release merging the PRs without the need of the reviews, as long as the CIs and /test_kata_deploy are successful.
/cc @kata-containers/architecture-committee
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
fidencio
transferred this issue from kata-containers/kata-containers
Nov 23, 2021
Thanks for raising this @fidencio. I'm sure we'd all prefer some manual reviews and acks but if the (global!) community are not able to react in a timely enough manner, we have to consider alternatives and this sounds like a pragmatic one.
Can you send a mail to the ML and add this to the AC meeting agenda so everyone is clear on this proposal:
If release PRs are not reviewed in a timely fashion (< 1 hour I'd say, but ideally even quicker), we are going to be forced to not require acks and automate the releases...
Anyone who has spent time doing releases has figured out that the process is time consuming, and one of the things that makes this more time consuming is having to find someone to review two PRs that are automatically generated and contain exactly what we expect from our scripts.
With this in mind, I really would like to ask whether we could have an agreement on the person who's handling the release merging the PRs without the need of the reviews, as long as the CIs and
/test_kata_deploy
are successful./cc @kata-containers/architecture-committee
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: