You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 1, 2020. It is now read-only.
Rules containing the "smt-lemma" attribute are used as axioms as is, i.e. without applying functions in them. This leads to "missing SMTLib translation" errors. For e.g., in the case the case of the EVM-Semantics, the following rule -
results in a missing SMTLib translation for pow256, which could be avoided if the pow256 function was applied. @andreistefanescu@bmmoore Is this expected (in which case we just don't use the function, and document the behavior), or a bug?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
msaxena2
changed the title
Macro Expansion for "smt-lemma" rules.
Macro Expansion for "smt-lemma" rules
Nov 23, 2017
msaxena2
changed the title
Macro Expansion for "smt-lemma" rules
Function application for "smt-lemma" rules
Nov 23, 2017
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Rules containing the "smt-lemma" attribute are used as axioms as is, i.e. without applying functions in them. This leads to "missing SMTLib translation" errors. For e.g., in the case the case of the EVM-Semantics, the following rule -
results in a
missing SMTLib translation for pow256
, which could be avoided if thepow256
function was applied. @andreistefanescu @bmmoore Is this expected (in which case we just don't use the function, and document the behavior), or a bug?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: