Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Zine branch that follows zig-dev? #113

Closed
0x546F6D opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed

Zine branch that follows zig-dev? #113

0x546F6D opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@0x546F6D
Copy link

The same way zine's dependency flow-syntax has a zig-0.14 branch, does zine have a branch that follows zig-dev? And if not, should it or is it too troublesome?

I have cloned zine/ziggy/supermd/superhtml/scripty and locally updated them to compile zine-ssg.io with zig-0.14.0-dev.2649+77273103a (mostly due to those breaking changes: 0fe3fd0 and d11bbde). I have also changed the flow-syntax dependency to the zig-0.14 branch and websocket.zig to the latest commit as of yesterday.

I dont mind using zigup, but with a zig-dev branch, It would be easier to integrate zine into the workflow of someone who tries to follow zig-dev. And I'd be happy to PR that branch with my local one.

@MiXiPi
Copy link
Contributor

MiXiPi commented Jan 20, 2025

I agree with this, this was the reason I opened the issues tab. Would be good way to track latest changes and prepare for the next version on top of being able to support the development version.

@kristoff-it
Copy link
Owner

Current latest commit of main branch is tracking 0.14.0, that said, in general, I will stick to stable releases sorry. Zine has too many dependencies that would be need to be kept in sync (most of which are mine, true, but it's still a bunch of code churn).

It will get easier going forward to support unstable Zig, but for now stable versions it is (until the time for a new release draws near again)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants