-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 800
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Supporting Parameter to Assume Role in Storage Class Definition #1191
Comments
/kind feature |
Hi @sarguru Can we have a specific use case for different KMS Key IDs access with two roles? Thank you! |
Will this need different STS token for those different roles also? (also waves ) |
Hi @gtxu ! One of the sample scenarios can be
@gnufied (👋 s back!) I believe we will need different set of STS tokens for each role (depending on the storage class definition) if my understanding is correct. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close not-planned |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned". In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/reopen |
@ConnorJC3: Reopened this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remvoe-lifecycle stale |
Problem
Currently, EBS CSI controller has a 1-1 mapping between the SA account and AWS IAM role used for the API operations i.e, all the API operations for the Controller happens using this single role (or credentials supplied alternatively). This is a problem, when different storage classes need to have tighter permission boundaries. The following are some of the use-cases where this problem might arise
Potential Solution
Supporting
assumeRoleARN
as a parameter along withkmsKeyID
and using the mentioned role for operations pertinent to the given storage class definiton.Eg:
Alternative Considered
Running multiple controllers in a single cluster but couldn't find much information about this and prior art of doing this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: