From b3b51f102e598449de0b76675dfba64008e2846f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anna Kvashchuk Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 14:48:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Use np.allclose instead of np.array_equal --- tests/unit_tests/analysis/test_adaptive_localization.py | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/unit_tests/analysis/test_adaptive_localization.py b/tests/unit_tests/analysis/test_adaptive_localization.py index f8e7533e25a..1f0f976f75d 100644 --- a/tests/unit_tests/analysis/test_adaptive_localization.py +++ b/tests/unit_tests/analysis/test_adaptive_localization.py @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ def test_that_adaptive_localization_with_cutoff_1_equals_ensemble_prior(copy_cas prior_sample, posterior_sample = run_cli_ES_with_case("poly_loc_1.ert") # Check prior and posterior samples are equal - assert np.array_equal(posterior_sample, prior_sample) + assert np.allclose(posterior_sample, prior_sample) @pytest.mark.integration_test @@ -97,4 +97,4 @@ def test_that_adaptive_localization_with_cutoff_0_equals_ESupdate(copy_case): prior_sample_noloc, posterior_sample_noloc = run_cli_ES_with_case("poly_no_loc.ert") # Check posterior sample without adaptive localization and with cut-off 0 are equal - assert np.allclose(posterior_sample_loc0, posterior_sample_noloc, rtol=1e-08, atol=1e-08) + assert np.allclose(posterior_sample_loc0, posterior_sample_noloc)