You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I tried to explore the KITTI-C dataset, I found that the model performance of the 'wet_ground' corruption is same at all three levels. So I wonder if there are some problems in the point cloud data under this condition?
We observed similar patterns with some models in our benchmark (see our supplementary file). We conjecture that this is because the wet_ground (mainly causes missing points on the ground) is not a very sensitive type of corruption to existing 3D perception models.
Indeed, the LiDAR scenes are imbalanced towards certain majority classes, including the ground. A certain loss of LiDAR points for these classes will not likely be an issue since there are a sufficient number of points remaining during the training.
Thanks for your work.
When I tried to explore the KITTI-C dataset, I found that the model performance of the 'wet_ground' corruption is same at all three levels. So I wonder if there are some problems in the point cloud data under this condition?
Note: I download the KITTI-C dataset from https://opendatalab.com/OpenDataLab/KITTI-C/tree/main/raw
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: