You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What do you think about using eccentricity as opposed to minor length as a threshold in detection blocks?
I feel that then to rule out small stars one can use min_area, and using eccentricity rather than minor_length would then be a pure parameter to control the allowed ellipticity of stars. Using minor length seems to try to do both at the same time, and sometimes i then find it difficult to constrain the parameters correctly to only detect the stars i want. What do you think?
I will include it in the branch i'm building, if you like the idea!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes I think that's definitely a good idea. I thought this was well made but its not at all.
As you say: when using a PointSourceDetection block we should filter and get only truly point sources (based on eccentricity). This idea was implemented in the AutoSourceDetection block (see the algorithm here) but I don't see this enforced on any of the shape-specific detection blocks. With that we may be able to get rid of the minor_length.
What do you think about using eccentricity as opposed to minor length as a threshold in detection blocks?
I feel that then to rule out small stars one can use min_area, and using eccentricity rather than minor_length would then be a pure parameter to control the allowed ellipticity of stars. Using minor length seems to try to do both at the same time, and sometimes i then find it difficult to constrain the parameters correctly to only detect the stars i want. What do you think?
I will include it in the branch i'm building, if you like the idea!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: