You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 20, 2017. It is now read-only.
Hi. I would like to propose using Factom (factom.org) for creating a verifiable, auditable, citizen database (among other things). In essence, what Factom does (or will do, a working beta will be released in Q3), is takes a bunch of files, or some kind of database, hashes them, and puts a single entry on the bitcoin blockchain. The integrity of the database can be verified following the same procedure and comparing with the entry on the bitcoin blockchain. To add an entry, you need to pay a small fee in "factoids", but I don't see this as being a problem.
In its simplest form, the citizen database would only constitute a citizen number, and some form of identity that can not be forged. For identity, I would propose something like these (but there are obviously other options):
PGP public key
Bitcoin public address (for signing, in addition to the PGP key)
Bitmessage email address
I2P-bote email address
If people think that Factom is a good idea, I would be happy to contact them and see what they propose. For practical measures, I am not sure if they would propose database hosting options, or if that would be up to us to manage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hi. I would like to propose using Factom (factom.org) for creating a verifiable, auditable, citizen database (among other things). In essence, what Factom does (or will do, a working beta will be released in Q3), is takes a bunch of files, or some kind of database, hashes them, and puts a single entry on the bitcoin blockchain. The integrity of the database can be verified following the same procedure and comparing with the entry on the bitcoin blockchain. To add an entry, you need to pay a small fee in "factoids", but I don't see this as being a problem.
In its simplest form, the citizen database would only constitute a citizen number, and some form of identity that can not be forged. For identity, I would propose something like these (but there are obviously other options):
If people think that Factom is a good idea, I would be happy to contact them and see what they propose. For practical measures, I am not sure if they would propose database hosting options, or if that would be up to us to manage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: