Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Package version should not include distro specific versions #1

Open
lerwys opened this issue Sep 11, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Package version should not include distro specific versions #1

lerwys opened this issue Sep 11, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@lerwys
Copy link
Contributor

lerwys commented Sep 11, 2019

In a lot of roles, we are including a specific debian package version, which is generally ok, but we are also specifying the "debian revision" part (https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#version). This is, if I'm not mistaken not guaranteed to be kept in the debian archives.

The proposal is to remove the last part and keep only the upstream version. For instance lnls-ans-role-python recently broke (88e75fe) as the revision "-1" was not available anymore,
@lerwys lerwys added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 11, 2019
@xresende
Copy link
Contributor

xresende commented Sep 20, 2019 •
edited
Loading

ok, @lerwys. For a few commits now we have been moving away from specifying the last part of the revision numbering. Soon I will submit a PR finishing the process.

xresende pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2020
@carneirofc
Merge pull request #1 from lnls-sirius/master
448184c 
Sync with lnls-sirius
@lerwys
Copy link
Contributor Author

lerwys commented Sep 11, 2020 •
edited
Loading

This has long been fixed, right @xresende ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lerwys @xresende