Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changed expected datatype of various options to number #309

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arenard
Copy link

@arenard arenard commented Feb 24, 2019

These options are mapped to numeric values in kafka configuration:

  • auto_commit_interval_ms,
  • connections_max_idle_ms,
  • fetch_max_bytes,
  • fetch_max_wait_ms,
  • fetch_min_bytes,
  • heartbeat_interval_ms,
  • max_partition_fetch_bytes,
  • max_poll_interval_ms,
  • max_poll_records,
  • metadata_max_age_ms,
  • receive_buffer_bytes,
  • reconnect_backoff_ms,
  • request_timeout_ms,
  • retry_backoff_ms,
  • send_buffer_bytes,
  • session_timeout_ms

@arenard arenard changed the title Changed expected datatype of various options to number: Changed expected datatype of various options to number Feb 24, 2019
@arenard arenard force-pushed the fix-options-datatypes branch from 4493364 to 205d6d9 Compare February 24, 2019 19:15
`auto_commit_interval_ms`, `connections_max_idle_ms`, `fetch_max_bytes`, `fetch_max_wait_ms`,
`fetch_min_bytes`, `heartbeat_interval_ms`, `max_partition_fetch_bytes`, `max_poll_interval_ms`,
`max_poll_records`, `metadata_max_age_ms`, `receive_buffer_bytes`, `reconnect_backoff_ms`,
`request_timeout_ms`, `retry_backoff_ms`, `send_buffer_bytes`, `session_timeout_ms`
@arenard arenard force-pushed the fix-options-datatypes branch from 205d6d9 to e6de3dd Compare February 24, 2019 19:34
@jsvd jsvd requested a review from karenzone March 5, 2019 22:11
Copy link
Contributor

@robbavey robbavey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@arenard - thanks for the contribution. This looks like a good change, just a couple of asks:

The change is backwardly compatible, so no need to do a major version bump, just the patch version can be bumped.
Can we add some tests to verify the changes?

Copy link
Contributor

@karenzone karenzone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Documentation (asciidoc file) builds cleanly and looks good. Thanks for your contribution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants