Proposal: allow all options to be passed through trix_editor_tag

[kylefox]

First off, thanks for the great library 👍 Dropping it in was a breeze!

I'd like to pass some extra attributes to the <trix-editor> tag. For example, required="true" and some data-* attributes.

I noticed that trix_editor_tag only passes specific options into the underlying call to content_tag.

What do you think about passing options directly into content_tag?

Cheers,
Kyle.

[rutger1140]

Plus one on this.

[ThunderGuppy]

Agreed. This would be awesome.

[maclover7]

@kylefox Thanks for opening up this issue! I'd definitely be open to having this be a thing. Please feel free to send over a pull request.

[paullimzw]

it would be great if it could work with client_side_validations

[rvanlieshout]

The editor itself only uses autofocus and placeholder. I've got a MR for this that might require some discussion about what needs to be passed to the hidden input and what needs to be passed to the trix-editor-tag

[kylefox]

PR #67 (including specs + README) submitted!