support https://github.com/jtroo/kanata #150
-
It is more actively developed and has advantages over kmonad. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Thanks for the suggestion! I've added a list of candidates for other implementations at the bottom of #90. Due to limited time, I would only add a new implementation where it would cover a whole new class of keyboards. In the case of kanata, Miryoku is already supported on Linux and Windows by Miryoku KMonad and also on Linux by 𝑥MK. Adding a new implementation is fairly easy, see for example manna-harbour/miryoku_babel@bc5c15a adding support for KMonad to Miryoku Babel, plus the makefile and include files in Miryoku KMonad. But as any changes to Miryoku need to be supported in all implementations, there's also an ongoing maintenance cost. If you're interested in making a Miryoku Kanata implementation I'd be happy to accept a PR for Miryoku Babel, but you'd need to keep the Miryoku Kanata implementation up to date with future changes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
i had some time this morning and i got a (mostly) functional fork of miryoku_kmonad working here |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Thanks for the suggestion!
I've added a list of candidates for other implementations at the bottom of #90.
Due to limited time, I would only add a new implementation where it would cover a whole new class of keyboards. In the case of kanata, Miryoku is already supported on Linux and Windows by Miryoku KMonad and also on Linux by 𝑥MK.
Adding a new implementation is fairly easy, see for example manna-harbour/miryoku_babel@bc5c15a adding support for KMonad to Miryoku Babel, plus the makefile and include files in Miryoku KMonad. But as any changes to Miryoku need to be supported in all implementations, there's also an ongoing maintenance cost.
If you're interested in making a Miryoku Kanata i…