-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multi-task interface can take a while to save the result of many tasks #2518
Comments
A couple of comments here @ygra and thanks for raising this issue.
Did you contact the challenge owner about the large number of already fixed tasks? |
Yes, I did. They rectified that quickly. However, that particular challenge was also very amenable to fixing hundreds of tasks at once, especially when large numbers of trees were mapped in a single location. So even for tasks that aren't already solved it's helpful. With enough tasks solved at once you also invariably get an error that the next task cannot be locked, which may also be due to the long delay between clicking "Submit" and the next task loading. That being said, I'm not sure how often this is actually a problem. Many challenges are more complex to solve or require drawing/changing geometry where it's typically unfeasible to handle hundreds of tasks at once. So this might be a special case for challenges that
I don't see the number of tasks to multi-task exceeding a few dozen at most for most other challenges. At least not if you want to complete all tasks in a reasonable time and want to keep the changeset bounds somewhat sane. |
Thanks @ygra for the additional comment / info. I am curious to see what you think after we deploy the new version. I hope it is an improvement for your work. I will leave this ticket open in case you want to discuss further, but feel free to close it at any time. |
Describe the bug
Using the Multi-task feature (awesome for certain tasks, by the way), when editing hundreds of tasks saving the result (Fixed, Already fixed, etc.) can take a while. While in itself that can be expected, the UI remains responsive during that time, giving no indication that work is still happening in the background and potentially leading to further interaction that might compromise the background operation.
Expected behavior
Some sort of indicator about ongoing background work would be nice, especially because the UI switches to the next task only after background work is complete and the UI can be used during that time.
This was noticed in challenge 44817 where there are some places that have hundreds, if not thousands of tasks already fixed and this allows really efficient processing here. I guess for more edit-heavy tasks with lots of work to be done you wouldn't often edit hundreds of items at the same time. For 149 tasks saving the result took 19 seconds for me.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: